[Jeju Loan Attorney Favorable Judgment Case] Jeju Loan Attorney Succeeds in Recovering the Client's Loan

The client in this case sought to recover the loaned money through litigation with the assistance of the Jeju loan attorney.

An acquaintance with whom the client was usually close asked the client to lend the costs of opening a store, and the client lent about 50 million won over several occasions.

A loan certificate was prepared and a repayment date was set, but as that date approached, the defendant offered various excuses and did not repay.

Because the defendant was a close acquaintance, the client waited, but seeing the defendant refuse contact and avoid the matter, the client decided to pursue litigation.

The client then came to the Daeryun Law Firm Jeju loan attorney and sought to recover the loaned money through civil litigation.

Loan Return Claim Litigation

• Civil Act Article 598 (Definition of a Loan for Consumption)

A loan for consumption takes effect when one of the parties agrees to transfer to the other party the ownership of money or other substitutes, and the other party agrees to return the same in the same kind, quality, and quantity.

• Civil Act Article 390 (Non-performance of Obligations and Damages)

Where an obligor fails to perform in accordance with the substance of the obligation, the obligee may claim damages. However, this shall not apply where performance has become impossible without the obligor's intent or negligence.

• Civil Act Article 393 (Scope of Damages)

(1) Damages for non-performance of an obligation shall be limited to ordinary damages.

(2) Damages arising from special circumstances shall be recoverable only where the obligor knew or could have known of such circumstances.

The defendant has delayed repayment of the loaned money borrowed from the plaintiff and has not paid the agreed principal and interest.

The plaintiff requested repayment of the loaned money on several occasions, but the defendant offered various excuses and continued to delay returning the loaned money, and the attorney argued that the defendant was intentionally refusing the plaintiff's contact.

The Jeju loan attorney submitted the loan certificate and the transaction record as evidence and proved that the plaintiff had lent money to the defendant.

However, despite the fact that the agreed repayment date had long passed, the defendant did not repay even 1 won to the plaintiff.

The attorney argued that the plaintiff had filed the litigation in order to recover the principal and the delay damages, and appealed for the court to grant the claim in full.

This case was an example of a client who succeeded, with the assistance of the Jeju loan attorney, in recovering loaned money that had not been returned.

If you are in difficulty because you have not been able to recover loaned money, recovering it through litigation is the most reliable method.

In a loan lawsuit, it is important to obtain the assistance of an experienced attorney and to prove that there was a money transaction.

If you need legal help in a situation similar to the case above, you may entrust the matter to the Daeryun Law Firm Jeju loan attorney at any time.