Uijeongbu School Violence Attorney | Securing a Decision of No Disposition Through the Assistance of a Uijeongbu School Violence Attorney for a Client Identified as a School Violence Offender

The client who sought out the Uijeongbu school violence attorney said that the client had been named as a perpetrator of school violence and was afraid that, if a measure were imposed through the School Violence Committee, a record would remain on the school record.

The client’s account was as follows.

The client often played games with classmates during the lunch break, and on the day of the incident the client played games with students from another class.

These were students with whom the client was not close enough even to know their names, and the client’s companions began to direct insulting remarks at the victim student, disparaging the student’s appearance.

When the victim student in the Uijeongbu school violence attorney case placed an index finger to his lips, gesturing for quiet, the companions suddenly took turns slapping the client’s cheek.

The client was flustered, but out of fear of also being harmed, the client remained still.

To get out of the situation, the client first left the spot and, after all classes had ended, returned home, but the victim student reported all of the companions, including the client, for school violence.

The client therefore sought out the Uijeongbu school violence attorney and requested assistance.

The Uijeongbu school violence attorney examined the measures that may be imposed on a student who perpetrates school violence.

The measures available against a student who perpetrates school violence include a written apology (No. 1), a prohibition on contact, intimidation, and retaliation (No. 2), school service (No. 3), community service (No. 4), special education or psychological treatment (No. 5), suspension of attendance (No. 6), a change of class (No. 7), a transfer to another school (No. 8), and expulsion (No. 9).

Here, measures up to No. 3 are deleted from the school record upon graduation, while Nos. 4 and 5 are retained for 2 years after graduation, Nos. 6 through 8 for 4 years, and No. 9 is retained permanently.

In this regard, as an exception, measures up to No. 7 may be deleted through a review conducted immediately before graduation.

The Uijeongbu school violence attorney provided assistance for the client as follows.

As to the school violence matter, the client has come to realize, and deeply regrets, that by worrying only about the client’s own safety, the client failed to consider that the victim student would be hurt.

However, at the time, the client did not engage in any direct act of harm and merely failed to stop the companions.

Even so, the client deeply regrets having acted without being more considerate of the victim student’s feelings at the time and has expressed a sense of remorse.

In addition, the client has expressed a wish to apologize in person if the victim student is willing to accept it.

The victim student in the incident did not point to anyone in particular and claimed, as though all of the alleged perpetrators had slapped the student’s cheek, but the client never engaged in such conduct.

In addition, when determining the measure against a perpetrator of school violence, the assessment is based on the intentionality, severity, and persistence of the conduct.

The client had almost no acquaintance with the victim student and, seeing the other companions strike the victim student, merely lacked the courage to stop them. There was no intentionality of school violence whatsoever, and because the client did not engage in any direct act of harm, there would likewise be no severity, and because it was an incident that occurred only once, there is no persistence either.

Accordingly, with respect to the client’s conduct, there is no room to find school violence.

The School Violence Committee, which accepted the argument of the Uijeongbu school violence attorney, rendered a decision of “no measure” with respect to the client.

The reasoning was that, because the client’s conduct did not constitute school violence, no measure would be imposed.

The client had been named as a perpetrator of school violence and might have had a record remain on the school record for life, but this result was obtained because the client promptly sought out the Uijeongbu school violence attorney and requested assistance.

If you have been named as a perpetrator of school violence and require assistance, you are welcome to seek out the Daeryun Uijeongbu school violence attorney and request a consultation at any time.