Deals & Cases

Destruction of Property
Destruction of PropertyNon-Prosecution

Gangnam Attorney Office | Gangnam Attorney, Non-Prosecution for a Client Who Removed a Flyer from an Apartment Elevator

The client was accused of the crime of destruction of property after removing a flyer that had been posted in an apartment elevator. The client requested the assistance of a Gangnam attorney.

1. How the Client Came to the Gangnam Attorney Office

Gangnam Attorney Office Background

The client was accused of the crime of destruction of property after removing an illegal flyer that had been posted on the mirror of an apartment elevator. The client requested the assistance of a Gangnam attorney. An attorney at the Gangnam branch office worked together with an attorney experienced in criminal cases to assist the client.

The Client Who Requested the Assistance of a Gangnam Attorney

The client was charged with the crime of destruction of property.

While taking the elevator to go home, the client looked into the elevator mirror, wanting to fix their hair.

However, an illegal flyer had been posted on the elevator mirror.

The client removed the flyer and looked into the mirror.

Three months later, the client was accused of the crime of destruction of property for having removed the flyer posted in the elevator.

The client requested the assistance of an attorney at the Gangnam branch office to defend against punishment for the crime of destruction of property.

Laws on the Crime of Destruction of Property, Explained by a Gangnam Attorney

The Gangnam attorney explained the 🔗crime of destruction of property.

The crime of destruction of property

refers to the crime of impairing the utility of another person's property or document by destroying or concealing it or by any other method.

The flyer the client removed was an unauthorized posting.

An unauthorized posting is an advertisement or notice posted without permission in a public place or on a particular building.

※ Penalty for the Crime of Destruction of Property

Criminal Act


▶ Article 366 (Destruction of Property, etc.)

A person who destroys or conceals another person's property, document, or special media records such as electronic records, or impairs their utility by any other method, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 3 years or a fine not exceeding 7 million won.

Article 371 (Attempts) An attempt to commit the crimes under Articles 366, 367, and 369 shall be punished.

*Because the level of punishment may differ depending on individual circumstances, please apply for an 🔗attorney legal consultation for an accurate review.

A Gangnam attorney consultation may be conducted online, by telephone, or by an in-person visit.

2. The Gangnam Attorney Office's Assistance

After conducting a thorough consultation with the client at the Gangnam attorney office, the Gangnam attorney made the following arguments.

Gangnam Attorney, Arguing That the Crime of Destruction of Property Is Not Committed

The attorney at the Gangnam attorney office explained that, for the crime of destruction of a document to be committed, the document must have utility value.

The attorney argued that the flyer the client removed was a flyer containing false information that had not even been permitted by the management office, so the crime of destruction of property was not committed.

Gangnam Attorney, Arguing That the Client Removed the Flyer for a Public-Interest Purpose

The reason the client removed the illegal flyer was to relieve residents of the inconvenience in using the elevator mirror.

In other words, the client acted only because they believed that removing the illegal flyer was proper, so neither intent nor unlawfulness is established.

The Gangnam attorney argued that the client's act of removing the flyer from the mirror was a justifiable act and not unlawful, and that this did not constitute the crime of destruction of property and could not be regarded as a crime.

Gangnam Attorney, Arguing That the Client's Act Carried No Criminal Liability

The client was generally aware that removing an item owned by another person could be problematic.

However, the client believed that removing an illegal flyer was permitted under the law.

The attorney at the Gangnam attorney office argued that the client's act carried no possibility of social blame and therefore could not be punished under criminal law.

3. The Gangnam Attorney Office's Assistance, Result: Non-Prosecution

With the assistance of the Gangnam attorney office, the client was able to obtain a non-prosecution disposition. The client once again expressed gratitude to the Gangnam attorney.

If You Are Looking for a Gangnam Attorney

The client was accused of the crime of destruction of property for removing an illegal flyer posted on the mirror of an apartment elevator.

With the assistance of a Gangnam attorney, the client was able to obtain a non-prosecution decision.

After the police conducted supplementary investigation, the client received a non-referral decision from the police, and ultimately, by defending at the prosecution stage, obtained a non-prosecution disposition on the ground of no suspicion of crime.

Even when a person arbitrarily removes a flyer posted without permission, the crime of destruction of property may be committed.

This requires a comprehensive assessment of various circumstances, such as whether intent and unlawfulness are established and whether the act amounts to a justifiable act.

For this reason, it is recommended to promptly retain an attorney from the early stage of the investigation.

At Daeryun, attorneys assist clients in this area.

If you are involved in the crime of destruction of property, please request the assistance of the 🔗Gangnam attorney at the Gangnam attorney office, which offers consultation and prompt response.

강남변호사사무실

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Destruction of Property: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney DongIl PARK

DongIl PARK

T. 070-5221-3616

criminal lawyer

Attorney Kuk Il KIM

Kuk Il KIM

T. 070-5117-2950

Experience as chief prosecutor of Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office and head of Goyang Branch of Uijeongbu District Prosecutors' Office

Attorney InWon KIM

InWon KIM

T. 070-7510-1044

Experience as Chief Prosecutor of the Criminal Division of the Hongseong Branch of the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office and Chief Prosecutor of the Criminal Department of the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office

Attorney JeongHang KO

JeongHang KO

T. 070-7510-1820

Criminal mediation committee member, Changwon District Prosecutors' Office

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

A Gwangju Criminal Case Attorney's Defense Case | Gwangju Criminal Case Attorney, Non-Referral for a Middle School Student in an Extortion and Assault Matter

Next

Suncheon Attorney Consultation | Occupational Negligence Causing Injury, Acquittal at First Instance Upheld Despite the Prosecutor's Appeal

View list
Quick Menu

Chat