Seongnam Traffic Accident Attorney Assistance | A Traffic Accident Settlement Act Client Receives a Non-Referral Decision with a Seongnam Attorney's Assistance

This is the situation of the client who requested assistance from a Seongnam traffic accident attorney.

On the day of the incident, the client stopped at a highway rest area on the way back from a business trip.

In a situation where the rest area was crowded and there were many vehicles, the client, who was trying to park, got into an argument with another vehicle.

When the other party became threatening, the client left the rest area as they were in order to avoid escalating the matter.

A few days later, the other party filed a criminal complaint against the client.

As a result, the client came to face charges of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and, asserting their innocence, came to a Seongnam attorney to request assistance with the traffic accident case.

The client was in a situation where they were, somewhat unfairly, facing charges of 🔗violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents .

The charge applies when, while driving, a person injures someone or damages property and then leaves the scene without taking any measures.

The relevant statutes are as follows.

▶ Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Article 3 (Special Cases concerning Punishment)

▶ Road Traffic Act Article 54 (Measures at the Time of an Accident)

On the day of the incident, the client had an argument with the victim.

The victim and their acquaintances got out of their vehicle, and the client, who felt fear at their threatening expressions, tone, and conduct, left the scene to prevent the matter from escalating.

The attorney argued that, at that point, an accident occurred in which the victim's arm came into contact with the side mirror, and that the client left the scene because they did not perceive it.

This case is an accident that occurred during the transition from a stationary state to a moving state.

At the time, the client's vehicle speed was very low, and the degree of impact with the victim was also minor.

The Seongnam traffic accident attorney proved this fact by submitting the dashcam and CCTV footage from the client's vehicle.

The injury referred to in the offense of hit-and-run causing injury means harming the integrity of the victim's body or causing a functional impairment.

However, the victim's injury was very minor, and it is difficult to recognize that they sustained an injury under the Criminal Act as a result of this incident.

Therefore, the attorney emphasized that the client's offense of hit-and-run causing injury cannot be recognized.

The case above was an instance in which a client facing an investigation for violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents received a no-right-to-prosecute decision with the assistance of a Seongnam traffic accident attorney.

Daeryun Law Firm has 🔗Cases of Violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, having accumulated numerous such cases, and traffic accident attorneys provide close assistance, accompanying clients directly from the initial investigation stage through to resolution.

If you need to defend against punishment in a situation like the case above, please feel free to request assistance from a Seongnam traffic accident attorney at any time.