Deals & Cases

Price of Goods
Price of GoodsWon the Case

Corporate Attorney | Corporate Attorney Who Represented a Company and Obtained Full Recognition of a Goods Payment Claim

The corporate attorney assisted a client who, after transferring the authority to operate the business to a counterparty, was not being paid for the goods. The corporate attorney obtained full recognition of the claim.

1. The Client Who Consulted the Corporate Attorney

The client who consulted the corporate attorney operated a small company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobile parts.

The defendant in this case was engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles, and the client had been supplying parts to the defendant company.

Later, as operating the company became difficult, the client transferred the authority to operate the client's company to the defendant company, and the defendant agreed to acquire the client's company.

However, separate from the acquisition of the company, there was an outstanding goods payment that the defendant had not made to the client.

The defendant argued that, because it had already taken over the operating authority and because the written undertaking to pay for the goods did not bear its seal, it had no obligation to pay.

The client explained that he had continued to do business with the defendant and that, even when the seal had been omitted in accordance with past practice, payment had always been made.

The client consulted the corporate attorney, stating that the amount the defendant had not paid was about 60 million won and asking for help in recovering it.

2. Goods Payment Explained by the Corporate Attorney

The client explained that he was not being paid for goods by the defendant company.

A goods payment refers to the amount received in return for supplying goods.

If, like the client, you have supplied goods but have not been paid, you may file a goods payment lawsuit.

The Goods Payment Lawsuit Procedure Explained by the Corporate Attorney

A goods payment lawsuit may be filed according to the procedure below.

Filing of the complaint > Submission of the answer > Preparatory briefs > Trial > Judgment > Compulsory execution

First, to file a goods payment lawsuit, you must file a complaint, and this complaint must be accompanied by evidence that the supply of goods was completed, such as the contract, transaction records, delivery slips, and invoices.

After the defendant submits an answer, the court serves a copy of that answer.

After the copy of the answer is served, the case proceeds through preparatory briefs and the trial, and the court's judgment is then issued.

If the defendant still does not pay even after the judgment, the payment can be recovered through compulsory execution proceedings, such as by attaching the other party's property.

A goods payment lawsuit can be seen as a contest of evidence, and it is difficult for an individual to prepare and submit legally effective evidence.

If, like the client in this case, you are about to file a goods payment lawsuit, it is recommended to seek the assistance of a corporate attorney.

3. The Goods Payment Lawsuit Filed by the Corporate Attorney

The corporate attorney filed a complaint, arguing as follows in order to recover the client's goods payment.

The defendant merely took over the business from the client, and the goods payment was a matter agreed upon in advance.

An employee of the defendant company prepared the written undertaking to pay the goods payment, and because that undertaking has legal effect, the defendant must pay in accordance with it.

The Defendant's Argument in the Corporate Attorney's Case

The defendant, having received the corporate attorney's complaint, sent an answer containing the following arguments.

The employee who prepared the written undertaking to pay the goods payment had no authority to decide the matter.

All goods payments other than the amount stated in the undertaking have already been paid in full.

The Corporate Attorney's Rebuttal of the Defendant's Argument

The corporate attorney rebutted the defendant's argument as follows and demanded payment of the goods payment.


Because the undertaking was prepared by a team leader who was an employee of the defendant, the defendant must bear responsibility for it.

Under the corporate transfer and acquisition agreement, the client transferred a bank account in the client's name to the defendant company.

The defendant argues that it paid the amount into the account in the client's name, but that account can no longer be used by the client.

4. The Judgment Led by the Corporate Attorney

Corporate Attorney
Clicking the image above will take you to the legal consultation booking page.

The court, having heard the corporate attorney's arguments, issued a judgment ordering the defendant to pay the client the entire amount of about 60 million won that the client had claimed.

In addition, the court ordered the defendant to bear all of the costs incurred in this lawsuit.

With the corporate attorney's assistance, the client was able to recover not only the full 🔗goods payment but also the litigation costs.

As in this case, when a legal dispute arises between businesses, the time required can become very long and affect daily life.

You may seek a corporate attorney to handle your case and protect your daily life. A corporate attorney can develop a strategy suited to the case and work toward a favorable outcome.

기업전문변호사 | 기업 대리해 물품대금소송 전액 인용 받은 기업변호사

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Price of Goods: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney ChanWoo JEONG

ChanWoo JEONG

T. 070-5221-2387

civil lawyer

Attorney HyeonSu KIM

HyeonSu KIM

T. 070-7510-2018

civil lawyer

Attorney MinYe SONG

MinYe SONG

T. 070-7510-1044

civil lawyer

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Trademark Infringement Lawsuit | A Case in Which the Plaintiff's Claim Was Dismissed and the Client's Trademark Right Was Protected

Next

Gunsan Damages Attorney | Gunsan Attorney Who Reversed the Original Judgment and Won on Appeal in a Damages Case

View list
Quick Menu

Chat