Theft Complaint | Accused of Theft but Obtained a Non-Referral Decision

The client expressed to the specialized attorney the position that the theft charge in this case was not true and that it was very unjust.

The client requested help so that the suspicion of the crime of larceny could be cleared and the case concluded as quickly as possible.

The Sentencing Commission sets the following sentencing guidelines for larceny.

The mitigating and aggravating factors for larceny are as follows.

If you are suspected of larceny, even if the suspicion is not true, you should seek the assistance of the firm's specialist attorney and set out to defend against punishment.

Based on the content of the consultation with the client, the specialist attorney organized in detail the situation at the time of the incident, the location of the remote control, and the client's movements.

Thereafter, through a preliminary simulation of the police questioning, the attorney refined the content of the responses so that the client could consistently state that he had not possessed or moved the remote control.

On the actual day of the police questioning as well, the specialist attorney accompanied the client and assisted with the entire process of his statement.

The attorney collaborated with the evidence investigation center and completed the securing of the CCTV footage inside the oriental medicine clinic.

Through this, the attorney confirmed the loss of the remote control and the client's movement route, and emphasized that the complainant's claims did not match the facts.

In addition, the attorney secured a statement from a coworker and submitted a written statement containing the content regarding whether the remote control was in the client's possession on the day of the incident.

The attorney emphasized that, because there was no fact that the client had taken the remote control, the elements of the crime of larceny were not satisfied.

The attorney argued that, although a scene in which the client briefly operated the remote control was confirmed, it was for the purpose of managing items within the scope of his occupational duties.

The specialized attorney argued that the conflict arising from the client's pregnancy and the discussion of parental leave was the essential cause of the incident, and that, as an extension of a private emotional dispute, it was a retaliatory complaint using a criminal complaint.

In addition, the attorney submitted in writing an account organizing the course of the case and the facts, and the absence of intent to commit theft, and requested that a non-referral decision be made for the client.

Because larceny, when established, carries the possibility of an actual custodial sentence, the assistance of a specialized attorney must be obtained.

A specialized attorney provides the following assistance in order to bring about a favorable result for the client in a larceny complaint case.

▶Consultation attorney : Reviewing the client's case and conducting the consultation
▶Attorney specializing in criminal cases : Analyzing the issues of the case and establishing a response strategy
▶Evidence investigation center : Lawful collection and analysis of evidence

This firm has branch offices nationwide and provides legal services of the same quality as the main office.

If you have had a larceny complaint filed against you, please find a nearby branch office and proceed with a 🔗legal consultation reservation to prepare a response strategy to protect your daily life.