Deals & Cases

Violation of the Special Act on the Prevention of Insurance Fraud
Violation of the Special Act on the Prevention of Insurance FraudNon-prosecution

Violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud | Non-Prosecution Despite Facing Punishment for Insurance Fraud

This is the story of a client who faced the risk of punishment on a charge of violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud. The client was charged with having committed insurance fraud, but through the assistance of the attorney he obtained a non-prosecution decision.

1. The Story of the Client Charged with Violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud

The story of a client suspected of violating the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud

This is the story of a client who sought the assistance of a specialized attorney, stating that he was suspected of violating the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud.


The client said that on the day of the incident he had driven his own vehicle for an hour to conduct a secondhand transaction.


However, around the time he arrived at the meeting place for the secondhand transaction, the person who had said he would buy the client's item closed his account and disappeared.


Upset by this, the client searched for a nearby cafe on his navigation system in order to calm down and return home.


As he was driving straight ahead with insufficient attention to the road, he belatedly noticed the other vehicle coming from the front and immediately applied the brake, but by mistake he pressed the accelerator, and this traffic accident occurred.

The Client's Charges

The owner of the damaged vehicle in this case continuously demanded an excessive settlement amount from the client.

However, the client refused to settle at the unreasonable amount, and the owner of the damaged vehicle proceeded with a complaint for insurance fraud, claiming that the client had caused the accident intentionally.

The client came to be suspected of having attempted to obtain insurance proceeds by intentionally causing a traffic accident so that the driver of the damaged vehicle would report the traffic accident to the insurance company, but having failed in the attempt.


The charge applied to the client was the crime of attempted insurance fraud under the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud.

2. Explanation of the Concept of Violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud

The Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud is a statute that sets out matters concerning the investigation, prevention, and punishment of insurance fraud.


Under the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud, the act of claiming insurance proceeds by deceiving the insurer as to the occurrence, cause, or content of an insured event is deemed an act of insurance fraud and becomes subject to punishment.


🔗Insurance fraud may give rise to a charge of violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud, punishable by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine not exceeding 50 million won.


In the case of a habitual offender, the punishment may be aggravated up to imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine not exceeding 75 million won.


In addition, an attempt is also subject to punishment, so caution is required.


Moreover, where the value of the insurance proceeds obtained through insurance fraud is 500 million won or more but less than 5 billion won, imprisonment for a definite term of at least 3 years applies, and where it is 5 billion won or more, the punishment is aggravated to life imprisonment or imprisonment for at least 5 years

Because a high level of punishment is provided for a violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud in this way, anyone under suspicion should prepare a response strategy at an early stage.

3. Responding to the Charge of Violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud

The specialized attorney provided the following assistance in order to respond to the client’s charge of violating the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud.

Emphasizing That the Client Was Driving His Own Vehicle at the Time of the Incident

The attorney argued that the insurance fraud charge was not true, emphasizing that the client was operating his own vehicle at the time this incident occurred.


In typical insurance fraud crimes, a rental vehicle is usually used in order to avoid an increase in insurance premiums.


In the client's case, however, the accident occurred while he was operating his own vehicle.


Moreover, in typical insurance fraud crimes, the offender causes a traffic accident by taking advantage of the fault of the other party's vehicle and then claims insurance proceeds.


In the client's case, however, he did not take advantage of the fault of the other party's vehicle, and on this basis the attorney argued that the charge of violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud against the client was not true.

Emphasizing That the Client Did Not File an Insurance Claim

The specialized attorney emphasized that the client did not claim insurance proceeds for the traffic accident in this case.


It is true that the client and the owner of the damaged vehicle reported the accident to the insurance company at the time the traffic accident occurred in order to handle it.


However, the attorney argued that the client's charge of violating the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud should be cleared, on the ground that, even though the client actually received hospital treatment, the client did not separately claim insurance proceeds.

Emphasizing That the Client, Having a Prior Record, Settled with the Victim Out of Fear

The attorney emphasized that the client had a prior record, including a past history of detention.


Because of this, the client held the belief that even if he argued he had no intent regarding the insurance fraud charge, he would not be believed.


Moreover, the owner of the damaged vehicle sent the client text messages on several occasions, to the effect that the police suspected insurance fraud and that he would not withdraw the complaint unless settlement money was sent quickly.


Out of fear of being detained again, the client hurriedly paid the settlement money.


On these grounds, the attorney emphasized that this accident occurred merely because the client failed to fulfill the duty to keep a proper lookout ahead, and not because of any intent to commit insurance fraud, and requested that a non-prosecution disposition be issued.

4. Result of Responding to the Charge of Violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud

Result of the response to the charge of violating the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud

As a result of the specialized attorney's response to the client's charge of violating the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud, the client was able to conclude the case by receiving a non-prosecution decision from the prosecution.


Although the client had merely caused a traffic accident through simple negligence, the client was unfairly suspected of insurance fraud and faced a situation in which an actual custodial sentence could have been imposed.


However, because a response strategy had been prepared based on the specialized attorney's case-handling data, the case was concluded at the prosecution stage.


In the case of a charge of violating the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud, it is treated as a crime of poor character and severe punishment is being imposed.

Therefore, if the charge is not true, one should respond quickly by retaining a specialized attorney.


If you make a 🔗legal consultation reservation with this firm, we will work toward a favorable result through a strategy tailored to the client.

보험사기방지특별법위반 | 보험사기 처벌 위기였으나 불기소 결정

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Violation of the Special Act on the Prevention of Insurance Fraud: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney BongHa SEO

BongHa SEO

T. 070-7510-1755

Experience as chief prosecutor at Uijeongbu District Prosecutors’ Office and chief prosecutor at Busan West Branch

Attorney Won SONG

Won SONG

T. 070-5117-3709

criminal lawyer

Attorney Dong Eun LEE

Dong Eun LEE

T. 070-7510-1822

Conducted numerous online/juvenile crimes

Attorney SeungPyo HONG

SeungPyo HONG

T. 070-7510-1118

Medical criminal lawyer

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Public Official Attorney | Client Charged with Wrongful Conduct After Accepting a Bribe; Sentence Reduced to a Suspended Sentence on Appeal

Next

Violation of the Resident Registration Act | Client Facing Punishment for Violation of the Resident Registration Act; Custodial Sentence Defended Through a Suspended Sentence

View list
Quick Menu

Chat