Deals & Cases

Construction All Risks Insurance Dispute
Construction All Risks Insurance DisputeWinning the case (favorable judgment)

Insurance Proceeds Dispute Assistance Case | Response to an Insurance Proceeds Claim for Material Damage in Commercial Facility Construction, “Winning the Case”

This is a case in which an insurance proceeds claim, relating to an insurance proceeds dispute concerning material damage and schedule delays that occurred during the construction of a commercial facility, was defended.

1. Insurance Proceeds Dispute, the Client's Request for Assistance

Insurance Proceeds Dispute, the Client's Request for Assistance, Case Example

The client, who was facing an insurance proceeds dispute, requested assistance from a corporate specialist attorney in order to respond to a large insurance proceeds claim arising from equipment defects and delays in the transportation of materials during the construction of a domestic privately financed commercial facility.

How the Dispute Arose

The client was an insurance company that operated construction all risks insurance for the construction of a domestic privately financed commercial facility.

During construction, the breakdown of external construction equipment and delays in the transportation of some materials delayed the interior finishing work, and the contractor claimed the cost of replacing the damaged materials and the construction delay costs as insurance proceeds.

The claimed amount was substantial, and because the cause of the incident was intertwined with multiple factors, including equipment defects, transportation problems, and external environmental factors, the situation required interpretation of the policy terms and a legal determination.

Accordingly, the client requested a strategic response and advisory counsel from a corporate specialist attorney.

2. Statutes and Issues Relating to the Insurance Proceeds Dispute

Construction all risks insurance (CAR) is insurance that covers various risks that may arise during construction, such as sudden accidents, equipment damage, material damage, and construction delays.

It compensates for losses to the works, materials, temporary structures, construction equipment, and the like that arise from an unforeseen accident during the construction process, and it also includes personal and property damage caused to third parties.

In other words, it is a system under which the contractor, the orderer, and other construction-related parties can receive comprehensive loss coverage in preparation for sudden situations that may arise during construction.

In particular, the internationally used CAR policy terms specifically prescribe the scope of insurance payment and the grounds for exclusion, so whether insurance proceeds are paid may differ depending on the cause of the incident and the scope of the loss.

In the insurance proceeds claim process, the following matters must be closely reviewed.

1. Confirmation of the scope of insurance payment: confirm whether the claimed loss is an item covered under the policy terms

2. Review of whether exclusion clauses apply: determine grounds for exclusion such as equipment defects, natural disasters, and transportation delays

3. Assessment of the scope of liability: distinguish whether the incident was the contractor's negligence or a sudden accident

Therefore, from the insurer's standpoint, an accurate review of the claimed amount and the cause of the incident is necessary, and when needed, it is important to proceed with a legal determination together with a specialist attorney.

3. Insurance Proceeds Dispute, the Corporate Specialist Attorney's Assistance

Insurance Proceeds Dispute, Construction All Risks Insurance, Matters of the Corporate Specialist Attorney's Assistance

This insurance proceeds dispute can largely be divided into three issues: the scope of insurance payment, the application of exclusion clauses, and the cause of the incident and the scope of liability.

The corporate specialist attorney established a strategy tailored to each issue and provided systematic assistance.

Analysis of the Scope of Insurance Payment

The corporate specialist attorney closely reviewed the contractor's claim items on an item-by-item basis to confirm whether each loss item was covered under the CAR policy terms.

At the same time, by comparing and analyzing the domestic legal standards and the international CAR policy terms, the attorney clearly distinguished the items subject to payment from those subject to exclusion.

On this basis, the attorney prepared legal grounds in advance and presented a strategic response plan so that the insurer would not pay unnecessary insurance proceeds.

Review of the Application of Exclusion Clauses

The corporate attorney closely analyzed the circumstances of the accident, including equipment defects, transportation delays, and external environmental factors, and assessed whether the exclusion clauses applied.

Referring to the terms of the construction works insurance policy and relevant precedents, the attorney organized the scope and limits of the grounds for exemption as a matter of law, and on this basis established a strategy to defend against the insurance payout.

In addition, the attorney documented the legal grounds so that the insurer would not be placed in a disadvantageous position in the dispute.

Assessment of the Cause of the Accident and the Scope of Liability

The corporate attorney comprehensively analyzed all relevant materials, including site photographs, equipment inspection records, and the accident report, and precisely assessed the cause of the accident.

Through this, the attorney legally distinguished whether the accident was a sudden, unforeseen event or negligence resulting from the contractor's lax management.

By reflecting the analysis in the strategy, the attorney prevented unnecessary insurance payouts and clearly defined the scope of the insurer's liability.

4. Insurance Payout Dispute Case Result, “Winning the Case”

Through the corporate attorney's thorough legal review and response strategy, a substantial portion of the insurance payout claimed by the contractor was excluded from the amount payable.

By obtaining a judgment limiting the scope of the insurance payout, the client minimized unnecessary cost burdens and successfully concluded the case.

If an Insurance Payout Dispute Has Arisen

Need for attorney assistance when a construction works insurance payout dispute arises

In an insurance payout dispute, legal issues such as the interpretation of the policy terms, the application of exclusion clauses, and the cause of the accident and the scope of liability are intertwined in a complex manner, so responding without specialized knowledge can be difficult.

In particular, where the amount claimed is large or the cause of the accident is multilayered, responding without a prior review may give rise to unnecessary payment burdens or risks.

Accordingly, it is essential to secure a legal basis for judgment through the assistance of a corporate attorney from the early stages of the case, and to prepare a strategic response.

Our firm forms a task force of corporate attorneys with extensive practical experience in construction works insurance, and comprehensively analyzes the CAR policy terms and legal principles to systematically support every step, including the review of claim details, the application of exclusion clauses, and the assessment of the cause of the accident.

In addition, based on numerous cases, the firm designs strategies for before and after a dispute arises at the same time, making its best efforts to respond to litigation and to provide a legal defense.

If you are in a situation where an insurance payout dispute has arisen and you need legal assistance, please feel free at any time to request assistance through 🔗Legal Consultation Booking.

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Construction All Risks Insurance Dispute: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney Kuk Il KIM

Kuk Il KIM

T. 070-5117-2950

Experience as chief prosecutor of Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office and head of Goyang Branch of Uijeongbu District Prosecutors' Office

Attorney JungKyu Park

JungKyu Park

T. 070-7510-2014

Senior Judge, Ansan Branch, Suwon District Court, Supreme Court Trial Researcher, Judge Experience

Attorney KeJun SON

KeJun SON

T. 070-5117-3709

Experience at the Fair Trade Commission, experience as a partner attorney at Gwangjang Law Firm

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Defamation Lawyer Defense Case | Client Charged With Defamation, Non-Prosecution

Next

Response to a Fair Trade Commission Investigation | Unfair Intra-Group Support, Minimal Penalty Surcharge Through the Assistance of a Corporate Law Attorney

View list
Quick Menu

Chat