Deals & Cases

Violation of the Network Act (defamation)
Violation of the Network Act (defamation)Non-prosecution

Defamation Lawyer Defense Case | Client Charged With Defamation, Non-Prosecution

The client, a career military officer who sought a defamation lawyer, had just been investigated by the military police on a defamation charge. To respond to the case, the client sought a defamation lawyer.

1. The Client Who Sought a Defamation Lawyer

This is the account of a client who, with the assistance of a defamation lawyer, defended against criminal punishment arising from defamation.

Background of the Defamation Case

The client, a career military officer, was experiencing a dispute over a refund in the course of entrusting administrative work to an administrative affairs office.

The client attempted to make contact several times, but the administrative affairs office unilaterally ignored the client's communications.

Feeling frustrated, the client posted a comment to the effect of "I am preparing for a lawsuit" on the administrative affairs office's blog post.

However, the administrative agent's side immediately regarded this as the statement of a false fact and filed a criminal complaint on the ground that it had damaged the office's social credit.

As a result, the client unintentionally became a defamation suspect subject to investigation by the military police, and requested assistance from a defamation lawyer.

defamation lawyer case background military criminal case handling

2. Laws Relevant to the Case as Explained by a Defamation Lawyer

The client who sought a defamation lawyer was charged with "defamation" in violation of Article 70 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.

Defamation is a crime that is established when a person, with the intent to disparage another, openly reveals a true or false fact through an information and communications network and thereby damages another person's reputation.

Requirements for Establishing Defamation

For defamation to be established, the following requirements must be met.

Category

Content

Actor

A person who posted or transmitted an expression through an information and communications network

Manner of conduct

Disclosing a true fact or a false fact

Publicity

It must be done in a state in which an unspecified or large number of people can perceive it

Purpose

There must be a purpose of defaming the other party

Result

A case in which another person's social evaluation or credit was lowered

Levels of Punishment for Defamation

Defamation is subject to different levels of punishment depending on whether the publicly disclosed fact is false.

Network Act Article 70 (Penalty Provisions)

Category

Level of punishment

Disclosure of a fact

Imprisonment with labor for not more than 3 years or a fine of not more than 30 million won

Disclosure of a false fact

Imprisonment with labor for not more than 7 years, suspension of qualifications for not more than 10 years, or a fine of not more than 50 million won

3. Assistance Provided by the Defamation Attorney

Defamation Attorney assistance provided punishment defense

The Defamation Attorney mounted a defense using the following legal principles and materials in order to specifically demonstrate that the client's conduct did not meet the elements of the crime of defamation under the Network Act.

Dispute Over Whether a Specific Fact Was Disclosed

The complainant claimed that the client's comment stating ‘A lawsuit is in preparation’ lowered the credit of the office.

However, the comment in question did not contain the complainant's name, the office's name, or any specific content at all.

Accordingly, the attorney presented the argument that it did not reach the standard of a ‘disclosure of a specific fact’ and was, rather, merely an expression of opinion or in the nature of a complaint.

In fact, by submitting material showing that even a third party at the military police investigation stage could not clearly understand the meaning of the comment and reacted by asking “What does this mean?”, it was possible to demonstrate that the comment was not specific enough to directly lower the social evaluation of a particular person.

Proof of the Absence of a Purpose of Defaming

The key to establishing defamation is the ‘purpose of defaming,’ and the complainant also claimed that the client's comment was a malicious act intended to disparage the complainant.

In response, the attorney presented as material the fact that, in a situation where the complainant did not respond to the client's refund request and unilaterally cut off contact, the blog was the last channel through which the client could convey an opinion.

In addition, the attorney emphasized that this conduct was not for the purpose of insulting the other party, but was simply an act intended to announce a claim of right and to request communication.

In the course of the military police investigation as well, the client's statements and the text message conversation history were consistently confirmed, and it was demonstrated that the circumstances of writing the comment were closer to ‘an appeal of an unfair situation’ than to ‘defaming.’

Denial of the Occurrence of a Defamatory Result

The complainant claimed that, due to the comment, the office's social evaluation was substantially lowered.

In response, the attorney emphasized, pointing to the fact that the comment did not even provide information by which an unspecified number of people could identify the complainant, and the fact that even a third party who saw the comment could not grasp its meaning, that the social reputation was not substantially harmed.

4. Result of the Defamation Attorney's Assistance: No Suspicion of Crime

Defamation Attorney assistance result no suspicion of crime non-prosecution

As a result of the Defamation Attorney's arguments and submission of evidence, the military prosecutors comprehensively recognized the following points and rendered a disposition of no suspicion of crime (non-prosecution) in this case.

① The point that the comment is difficult to regard as a disclosure of a specific fact

② The point that the client did not have a ‘purpose of defaming’

③ The point that a result of an actual lowering of social evaluation was not confirmed

As a result, the client was able to avoid the risk of being referred to a military criminal trial and suffering any disadvantage to military status or damage to reputation.

How to Respond to a Defamation Charge

Defamation cases are not determined solely by the content of a statement or post; rather, multiple factors are considered comprehensively, including whether a fact was asserted, the manner of expression, and the context.

Through its dedicated consultation attorney system, Daeryun LLC carefully identifies the facts and issues of the matter and assigns a dedicated attorney by case type to establish a response strategy tailored to the client.

When the evidence related to a case is insufficient, the collection and analysis of evidence can also be handled through coordinated collaboration with the Evidence Examination Center and the Digital Forensics Center.

If you are facing the risk of punishment on a charge of defamation, please feel free to entrust your case at any time through the 🔗Legal Consultation Reservation.

명예훼손전문변호사

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Violation of the Network Act (defamation): Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney ChanWoo JEONG

ChanWoo JEONG

T. 070-5221-2387

criminal lawyer

Attorney Young Hyoung KIM

Young Hyoung KIM

T. 070-7510-2014

criminal lawyer

Attorney YeongMin JEONG

YeongMin JEONG

T. 070-7510-1822

criminal lawyer

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Medical Negligence | Representing the Hospital, the Patient's Damages Claim Dismissed in Full

Next

Insurance Proceeds Dispute Assistance Case | Response to an Insurance Proceeds Claim for Material Damage in Commercial Facility Construction, “Winning the Case”

View list
Quick Menu

Chat