Deals & Cases

Corporate merger advisory
Corporate merger advisoryAdvisory provided

Assistance with Mergers and Acquisitions | Advisory Case on Acquisition of Startup Shares and Merger

This is a case in which, through merger and acquisition advisory, Company B acquired the shares of a startup and, through the merger procedure, stably secured new-business technology and human resources.

1. The Client Who Requested Merger and Acquisition Advisory

Circumstances of the case of the client requesting merger and acquisition advisory

Company B, which was planning a merger and acquisition, requested advisory from a corporate specialist attorney regarding the legal risks that could arise in the process of acquiring the shares of a promising startup and the merger, such as conflicts of interest among investors, intellectual property issues, and procedural requirements.

The Client Facing a Share Acquisition and Merger

Company B, which requested merger and acquisition advisory, reviewed the acquisition of a promising startup in order to enter a new business and strengthen its technological competitiveness.

The startup possessed original technology, but due to delays in fund-raising and a complex shareholder structure, it was difficult for it to grow independently.

Company B planned a strategy of first securing an initial 60% of the shares to obtain stable control, and then integrating the technology and personnel into its own company through a merger.

However, in the course of the transaction, legal risks arose, such as conflicts of interest among internal investors, non-disclosure contract clauses, and the attribution of intellectual property rights.

In particular, in the merger procedure following the share acquisition, procedural requirements such as the succession of employee employment, the protection of creditors, and the resolution of the general shareholders' meeting had to be satisfied.

Accordingly, the client came to a corporate specialist attorney and requested advisory.

2. Mergers and Acquisitions, Share Acquisition and Merger by Absorption

▶ Share Acquisition

This is a method of changing the composition of shareholders while maintaining the legal entity of the target company.

The procedure is relatively simple, but risks may arise in the calculation of the transaction value, the change of the shareholder structure, and tax treatment.

Therefore, it is important to secure the appropriateness of the transaction value through external valuation and expert review, and to check tax risks in advance in transactions with specially related persons.

▶ Merger by Absorption

This is a method in which the existing company legally absorbs the target company and integrates them into one corporation.

Since the organization, assets and liabilities, and personnel are all succeeded, procedural requirements such as the resolution of the general shareholders' meeting, the protection of creditors, and the succession of employee employment must be thoroughly prepared.

To minimize the disputes anticipated in the merger process, it is necessary to check financial, contractual, and intellectual property risks through prior due diligence, and to systematically manage the procedure and stakeholders.

Points to Note in a Merger and Acquisition

ㆍ Securing transparency in the calculation of the transaction price

ㆍ Inspecting hidden risks through financial and legal due diligence

ㆍ Merger procedures and coordination of stakeholders

ㆍ Tax and regulatory response

A share acquisition and an absorption merger go beyond the simple conclusion of a contract; they are complex procedures that require multilayered legal review under the Commercial Act, tax laws, the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act, and others.

If they proceed without advance preparation, unexpected risks such as nullity of the merger, tax burdens, and disputes among stakeholders may arise, so advice from a specialist attorney is essential.

3. Corporate M&A: Assistance Provided by the Corporate Specialist Attorney

Corporate M&A due diligence procedure business combination review share transfer contract structure design

The key issues in this case were the appropriateness of the transaction price calculation, the attribution of intellectual property rights, the coordination of stakeholders, and procedural legitimacy, all of which could arise during the share acquisition and merger.

In particular, conflicts of interest among internal investors, undisclosed contracts, and the issues of employee succession and creditor protection were key issues, and accordingly, assistance focused on contract design, tax and regulatory response, and procedural operation was required.

The corporate specialist attorney organized a task force composed of M&A experts centered on these issues and provided substantive assistance, including stabilizing the transaction structure, preventing potential disputes, and securing procedural legitimacy.

Contract Structure Design and Risk Review

The M&A specialist attorney specifically reflected the criteria for calculating the transaction price and the conditions for the attribution of intangible assets and intellectual property rights in the share purchase agreement and the merger agreement.

By clearly defining the scope of liability and the limit of damages in the event of a breach of warranties and representations under the contract, the attorney minimized the possibility of potential disputes arising.

In addition, the attorney reviewed the possibility of disputes anticipated after the merger and designed in advance a contract structure and protective measures capable of responding to them.

Regulatory and Tax Response

The corporate specialist attorney analyzed in advance the tax risks, such as corporate tax, capital gains tax, and value-added tax, that could arise during the share acquisition and merger.

The attorney designed the tax structure so that the transaction structure would not bring about any disadvantage under the tax laws, and prepared tax-saving measures for the period after the merger.

In addition, the attorney reviewed whether the transaction was subject to a business combination report to the Fair Trade Commission and, where necessary, prepared the submission materials, thereby blocking the regulatory risks of the M&A in advance.

Procedural Operation and Coordination of Stakeholders

By systematically managing essential procedures such as the startup's general meeting of shareholders and the resolution of Company B's board of directors, the attorney secured the legitimacy of the merger procedure.

The attorney coordinated in advance the possibility of conflicts of opinion among stakeholders such as investors, creditors, and employees, and negotiated the conditions for employee succession and the adjustment of the equity structure.

Through this, the attorney secured the stability of the organization and corporate operation after the merger and acquisition, and prepared for anticipated legal and financial disputes.

4. Result of the M&A Advisory

Company B completed the absorption merger procedure after acquiring the shares of the startup.

Through the assistance of the corporate specialist attorney, the company secured technology and core personnel and integrated them into its existing services, strengthened its research and development capabilities for new businesses, and was able to reduce the risks that could arise throughout the entire transaction process.

If You Need Assistance with a Merger and Acquisition

Corporate M&A merger ratio calculation shareholders' meeting approval acquisition financing contingent liability review

A company's share acquisition or absorption merger goes beyond the simple conclusion of a contract; it requires multilayered legal review, including contract structure design, coordination of investor interests, and tax and regulatory review.

If preparation is insufficient, risks such as nullity of the merger, unexpected tax burdens, and disputes among stakeholders may arise, so the assistance of an experienced specialist attorney is essential.

This firm provides comprehensive support from transaction structure design to due diligence, contract review, and procedural management, and makes its best efforts to ensure a stable transaction.

The firm has many corporate specialist attorneys with experience at large corporations and public institutions, and a number of experts with abundant field and practical experience communicate in real time to establish tailored strategies.

If you are facing a merger and acquisition and require legal advice, please request assistance through 🔗Legal Consultation Reservation.

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Corporate merger advisory: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney YoungKon CHO

YoungKon CHO

T. 070-7510-2014

Experience as Chief of Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office and Chief of Daegu District Prosecutors' Office

Attorney GeunSu KIM

GeunSu KIM

T. 070-5221-2805

Experience as chief prosecutor of Seoul Eastern Branch and chief prosecutor of Busan District Prosecutors' Office

Attorney Cheol Kim

Cheol Kim

T. 070-5117-3709

Experience as Chief Prosecutor of Busan District Prosecutors’ Office and Chief Prosecutor of Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office

Attorney KeJun SON

KeJun SON

T. 070-5117-3709

Many corporate M&A legal advisors

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Violation of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry | Decision of Non-Referral on the Suspected Violation of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry

Next

Case of Assistance by a Civil Litigation Attorney | Civil Litigation for the Price of Goods, Claim Granted in Full

View list
Quick Menu

Chat