Deals & Cases

Lawsuit to Revoke a School Violence Disciplinary Measure
Lawsuit to Revoke a School Violence Disciplinary MeasureWinning the Case (Favorable Judgment)

School Violence Disciplinary Measure | Judgment Revoking an Unjust School Violence Disciplinary Measure

The client who wished to contest a school violence disciplinary measure was the parent of a middle school student who had been identified as a perpetrator of school violence and given a disciplinary measure. Let us review the assistance provided by the attorney specializing in school violence.

1. School Violence Disciplinary Measure | Case Details

The client who asked for assistance with the procedure to contest a school violence disciplinary measure was the parent of a child in the first year of middle school.

While the client's child was chatting with friends in a KakaoTalk group chat room, one student in the group chat made disparaging and sexual remarks about a victim student.

The client's child did not actively endorse those remarks or make any specific comment, but, wishing to maintain relationships with friends given the mood of the conversation, simply gave reactions such as “lol,” “whoa,” and “that's a bit…”

However, when the victim student captured the contents of the chat room and reported it to the school, all of the students in the chat room were classified as perpetrators of school violence, and the School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee imposed a school violence disciplinary measure of community service on the client's child.

The client therefore decided to file a lawsuit to revoke the school violence disciplinary measure and entrusted the case to an attorney at Daeryun specializing in school violence.

School Violence Disciplinary Measure | Case Details

2. School Violence Disciplinary Measure | Types

🔗The School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee comprehensively considers the severity of the harmful conduct, the degree of harm to the victim, and the student's attitude of remorse, and then decides on one of the following nine levels of measures.

Category

Content of the Measure

Level 1

Written apology to the victim student

Level 2

Prohibition of contact with, and of retaliation against, the victim student or the person who reported or filed the accusation

Level 3

Service within the school

Level 4

Community service

Level 5

Completion of special education or psychological treatment

Level 6

Suspension from attendance

Level 7

Transfer to another class

Level 8

Transfer to another school

Level 9

Expulsion

A school violence disciplinary measure is recorded in the school records and has a significant effect on matters such as the student's admission to higher education.

Procedure for Responding to a School Violence Disciplinary Measure

If one wishes to contest a school violence disciplinary measure, the measure can be disputed through an administrative appeal before the Office of Education and through administrative litigation.

Procedure

Main Content

Notification of the disciplinary decision

Receipt of the decision of the School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee

Administrative appeal A request for revocation is possible where the disposition is unlawful or unjust

Administrative litigation

A lawsuit to revoke the school violence disciplinary measure is filed with the administrative court

Judgment and follow-up measures

Once a revocation judgment becomes final, a request to delete the disciplinary record is possible

If you have received a school violence disciplinary measure, before responding you should suspend the effect of the measure by filing for a provisional injunction with the court, so that an unfavorable situation can be prevented.

Our firm works together with attorneys specializing in civil matters and attorneys specializing in administrative matters to accompany clients through such response procedures.

3. School Violence Disciplinary Measure | Assistance From the Attorney Specializing in School Violence

In this case, the attorney specializing in school violence provided assistance through a three-stage strategy: reconstruction of the facts, review of procedural illegality, and proof of the unfairness of the severity of the measure.

Proof of the Facts Through Cooperation With the Digital Forensics Center

The attorney specializing in school violence cooperated with the Digital Forensics Center to recover the entire contents of the group chat room and to analyze the flow of the conversation.

As a result, it was clearly established that the client's child had never made any criticism, abusive language, or sexual remarks about the victim student and had only expressed emotional reactions.

The attorney specializing in school violence argued, on the basis of objective data, that the client's child had no intent to commit school violence.

Argument on the Unfairness of the Severity of the Measure

The attorney specializing in school violence compiled and submitted the student's diligent school records, statements from the homeroom teacher and the student guidance teacher, and a letter of reflection, among other materials.

The school records confirmed that the client's child had served as a class representative, had excellent academic achievement, and had been exemplary in club activities as well.

On this basis, the attorney argued that “the Level 4 school violence measure was excessive in light of the facts and was an unlawful disposition that violated the standards governing the severity of measures.”

Pointing Out the Procedural Defect

The disciplinary notice received by the client's child did not specifically state the reasons for the school violence disciplinary measure.

Accordingly, the attorney specializing in school violence raised the defect in the notice of the decision of the School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee and argued that the disposition in this case was unlawful.

4. School Violence Disciplinary Measure | Court Judgment

School Violence Disciplinary Measure | Court Judgment

The court fully accepted the arguments of the attorney specializing in school violence.

“There is no evidence that the client's child committed any act of insult or criticism against the victim student, and a passive reaction in the group chat room alone makes it difficult to find an intent of joint participation. In addition, because the reasons for the disposition of the School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee were not specifically stated, a procedural defect is recognized.”

On the basis of this reasoning, the court rendered a judgment revoking the community service (Level 4) disposition imposed on the client's child.

As a result, no record of the school violence disciplinary measure remained in the school records of the client's child, and the child thus avoided any disadvantage.

School Violence Disciplinary Measure FAQ

QuestionAnswer
Q1. If a community service measure is imposed, does it remain in the school records?

Yes. If a school violence disciplinary measure is imposed, it is recorded in the school records.

However, if a judgment revoking the disciplinary measure is obtained from the court, the record can be deleted.

Q2. If the School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee did not properly follow the procedures, is there a possibility of revoking the committee's disposition?

Yes, there is.

If the committee does not state its reasons or does not guarantee the student's and guardian's right to make statements, the disposition can be revoked through litigation.

Q3. If administrative litigation is filed, will it not cause a disadvantage to the student's status?

No, it will not.

Administrative litigation is a legal remedy procedure, and before the litigation proceeds it is also possible to file for a provisional injunction suspending the effect of the disciplinary measure.

Even if a school violence disciplinary measure has been imposed, as in this case, responding through cooperation between an attorney specializing in school violence and the Digital Forensics Center can lead to a judgment revoking the disciplinary measure.

If you are concerned about a school violence disciplinary measure, we recommend that you arrange a 🔗Legal Consultation Booking and, from the early stage of the case, receive the assistance of an attorney specializing in school violence to systematically prepare everything from analysis of the facts to response before the School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee and litigation.

학교폭력징계 | 억울한 학교폭력 징계 처분 취소 판결

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Lawsuit to Revoke a School Violence Disciplinary Measure: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney Dae Hee KANG

Dae Hee KANG

T. 070-5117-5510

Attorney specializing in school violence

Attorney HyungOh JEON

HyungOh JEON

T. 070-5221-2805

Attorney specializing in school violence

Attorney SangWook CHO

SangWook CHO

T. 070-5221-3616

Attorney specializing in school violence

Attorney SungAh KIM

SungAh KIM

T. 070-5214-2362

Attorney specializing in school violence

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Defense Against Punishment for Narcotics | A Client Who Inhaled a Narcotic Abroad Receives Non-Prosecution With the Assistance of a Criminal Attorney

Next

Aiding and Abetting Fraud Case | A Suspended Sentence for a Client Who Served as a Money-Laundering Operative

View list
Quick Menu

Chat