Defense Against Punishment for Narcotics | A Client Who Inhaled a Narcotic Abroad Receives Non-Prosecution With the Assistance of a Criminal Attorney

In the past, while traveling abroad, the client inhaled ketamine once out of curiosity together with a friend.

The client, who later came to be investigated by the police following someone’s report, denied the offense at first out of fear of receiving an actual custodial sentence.

However, the client, fearing that this might lead to a heavier punishment, wisely requested the assistance of an attorney in order to prepare countermeasures.

In the first police investigation, the client, having no experience with investigative authorities, denied the offense out of fear of punishment.

In response, the criminal attorney, through systematic assistance, clearly proved the client’s responsible attitude and prepared the grounds on which a non-prosecution disposition could be obtained.

On the first day of the trip, when a local recommended ketamine as being safe, the client inhaled it once out of curiosity.

In response, the criminal attorney, through the following assistance, proved that this was not an intentional ingestion and prepared a strategy to minimize any disadvantage.

The client is a first-time offender with no criminal record of any kind, and, taking this incident as an occasion, is firmly resolved to never again touch narcotics and to live a life of complying with the law and serving others.

In response, the criminal attorney, through systematic assistance such as completion of reoffending-prevention education and support in establishing a life plan, clearly proved the client’s good faith and will to improve, and prepared a strategy so that this could be reflected favorably in the sentencing and the disposition.

In order to respond to punishment for narcotics, it is important to accurately organize the facts from the early stage of the case, to cooperate faithfully during the police investigation, and to systematically record statements and evidence.

If you objectively prove whether the ingestion was unintentional and the circumstances surrounding it, and clearly organize the prevention of reoffending and the will to improve, this can be reflected favorably in the disposition.

It is also effective to systematically prepare the relevant materials and to consistently submit the facts and circumstances concerning the case as a whole.

Daeryun Law Firm closely analyzes cases and establishes a systematic defense strategy in order to minimize disadvantages in narcotics cases.

Through its own evidence investigation center, it thoroughly reviews the relevant materials and secures objective evidence by using narcotics testing, evidence forensics, and a polygraph, among other methods.

If you wish to defend against punishment for narcotics in a situation such as the above, please request assistance at any time through the 🔗consultation appointment of Daeryun, the ninth-largest law firm in Korea (based on 2025 National Tax Service value-added tax filings).