Deals & Cases
Insult of a Superior Officer Case | A Soldier Who Verbally Abused a Superior Obtains a Suspension of Sentencing With the Assistance of a Criminal Defense Attorney
The client, who was reported on suspicion of insult of a superior officer, requested the assistance of a military criminal law attorney who had handled numerous military criminal cases, including insult of a superior officer, in order to obtain a suspension of sentencing.
1. Client Charged with Insulting a Superior Officer
The client, who faced charges of insulting a superior officer, had directed severe verbal abuse at a superior officer and was at risk of punishment. With the assistance of an attorney specializing in military criminal cases, however, the client was able to receive a suspension of sentencing.
A suspension of sentencing is a system under which guilt is recognized but the pronouncement of sentence is exempted if the defendant complies with certain conditions for a fixed period.
As a result, the client avoided punishment and was able to conclude the case without a criminal record.
Background of the Case
The client had long been on poor terms with a superior officer, Mr. A, and felt dissatisfied because he believed that Mr. A discriminated against him and his fellow soldiers.
Later, in a setting where many people were present, the client was unable to control his emotions and directed severe verbal abuse at Mr. A. As a result, he became subject to an investigation by the military Ministry of Justice on the charge of publicly insulting a superior officer.
Fearing punishment, the client requested assistance with the case of insulting a superior officer from an attorney specializing in military criminal cases.

2. Strategy for Defending Against Punishment for Insulting a Superior Officer
The attorney specializing in military criminal cases identified the following issues in the case so that the client could receive a suspension of sentencing.
The principal issue in this case was whether there were mitigating circumstances that could support a suspension of sentencing, such as the client's age, whether this was a first offense, and the diligence of his military service.
Based on these issues, a response strategy was formulated to assist the client.
Whether the Requirements for a Suspension of Sentencing Are Met
The attorney specializing in military criminal cases assisted the client by explaining that, on the basis of Article 59 of the Criminal Act (Penal Code), a suspension of sentencing could be considered when certain circumstances exist.
It was emphasized that, although the client was at fault for making inappropriate remarks to a superior officer, the following points sufficiently warranted the expectation that he would not commit the same wrong again even without the pronouncement of a sentence.
- The client is young and performed his military service diligently
- This is a first offense
Analysis of Relevant Precedents
The attorney specializing in military criminal cases reviewed precedents in which a suspension of sentencing had been pronounced in situations similar to that of the client.
According to Busan District Court 2021 Godan 907, a suspension of sentencing was pronounced in consideration of the fact that, although the defendant had made insulting remarks to a superior officer, he had performed his military service diligently and posed a low risk of reoffending.
Accordingly, the attorney specializing in military criminal cases emphasized, focusing on the client's specific circumstances and sincerity, that a suspension of sentencing could readily be considered.
Settlement with the Victim
With the assistance of the attorney specializing in military criminal cases, the client prepared a settlement with Mr. A and carried out a deposit with an official depository.
The attorney specializing in military criminal cases served as a facilitator during the settlement process so that the client could resolve the case promptly, and supported the smooth progress of the procedure by advising on the calculation of the deposit amount and the method of submission.
It was emphasized that, accordingly, Mr. A expressed his intention not to seek punishment of the client and prepared a settlement agreement that was submitted to the court.
3. Result of the Case of Insulting a Superior Officer: ‘Suspension of Sentencing’

Based on the strategic assistance of the attorney specializing in military criminal cases and an amicable settlement with the victim, the client demonstrated a remorseful attitude and a low likelihood of reoffending, and was able to receive a suspension of sentencing.
Satisfied with this outcome, the client expressed gratitude, stating, “Thanks to the attorney, the case was resolved amicably.”
FAQ on Military Criminal Matters
Q. How does the crime of insulting a superior officer differ from ordinary insult?
A. The crime of insulting a superior officer is an offense committed against a higher-ranking person within the military organization. Unlike ordinary insult, the level of punishment is set higher in order to protect military order and the authority of superiors.
In addition, in light of the special nature of the military, it may be judged more strictly than ordinary insult during the investigation and trial process.
Q. In the case of insulting a superior officer, is punishment waived if a settlement is reached with the victim?
A. Because the crime of insulting a superior officer is not a crime requiring a complaint to prosecute, reaching a settlement with the victim does not automatically waive the legal punishment itself.
However, if the victim expresses an intention not to seek punishment and submits a settlement agreement to the court, the likelihood increases that the court will take this into account and render a favorable judgment, such as a mitigation of sentence or a suspension of sentencing.
4. Elements of Insulting a Superior Officer

Insulting a superior officer is a crime that may be established when a person engages in disrespectful or insulting words or conduct toward a higher-ranking person in the military.
The elements are as follows.
② making insulting remarks or engaging in conduct that lowers his social standing
Level of Punishment
Insulting a superior officer may be punished as follows under Article 64 of the Military Criminal Act.
Because the level of punishment is higher than that for ordinary insult, an early response is of the utmost importance if one becomes involved in such a case.
Act | Level of Punishment |
Insulting a superior officer to his face | Imprisonment with or without labor for not more than 2 years |
Insulting a superior officer by displaying documents, drawings, or images, or by a speech or other public means | Imprisonment with or without labor for not more than 3 years |
Publicly stating a fact and thereby damaging the reputation of a superior officer | Imprisonment with or without labor for not more than 3 years |
Publicly stating a false fact and thereby damaging the reputation of a superior officer | Imprisonment with or without labor for not more than 5 years |
If You Need Professional Assistance
Daeryun LLC has numerous attorneys with extensive experience in military criminal cases.
Considering the particular circumstances of each case and internal military regulations, the firm establishes tailored strategies and provides prompt and accurate legal responses.
If you become involved in a case of insulting a superior officer, please feel free to request assistance from Daeryun LLC through the 🔗Legal Consultation Booking.

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.
Insult of a superior officer: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?
Consult aspecialized attorney
Related Information
Explore legal information related to this case.
Criteria for Establishing the Crime of Insulting a Superior Officer and What to Verify Before a Military Police Investigation
Punishment Standards and Defense Strategies for the Crime of Insubordination
When Accused of Insult by Abusive Language: Elements of the Offense, Punishment Standards, and Methods of Evidence Collection
Daeryun's Key Strengths

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology
More than 240 key members
1,200+ cases handled per month
* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)
more strengths
Book a legal
consultation with an attorney
All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.
Phone consultation
1800-7905
Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year


Online consultation
We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation
KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys
Related Members
View more
In Ho SEO
T. 070-7510-3368
Military judge of the 3rd and 5th Corps, legal staff member of the 2nd and 11th Division
Key Case Studies
View more- Non-prosecution
Non-prosecution for a Client Charged With Insult of a Superior Officer

- Acquittal
Acquittal of a Soldier Charged With Insult of a Superior Officer Through a Suwon Attorney's Assistance

- Non-Prosecution
Assisting a Client Who Insulted a Superior Officer to Obtain a Decision Not to Prosecute

Related Practice Areas
View moreConsult in other languages
Popular Columns
View morePunishment Standards and Response Methods for Violations of Sexual Discipline in the Military

How to Respond to Military Assault, the Reporting Procedure, and Punishment of the Offender

The Procedure in Military Criminal Cases, Response Strategies, and the Need to Retain an Attorney

Punishment Criteria and Directions for Response According to the Types of Draft Evasion under the Military Service Act

What Are the Method of Reporting Cruel Treatment in the Military and the Punishment Standards?

Previous
Corporate Legal Advisory Attorney Assistance Case | Advisory on the Transfer of Management Control through the Issuance of New Shares
Next
Violation of the Juvenile Protection Act | Motel Owner's Suspected Permitting of Juvenile Cohabitation Concluded with a Non-Referral Decision
View listDo you have more questions?















