Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Antitrust Practice

Your general counsel has said the company needs antitrust counsel for a deal, an investigation, or a new pricing program. You want to know what that work actually looks like and how to keep it efficient.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Antitrust Practice: what usually happens

How engagements are usually scoped

An antitrust practice generally handles clearing transactions, litigation and government investigations, and counseling on business conduct. Counseling is often the least visible and the most preventive, covering pricing policies, distribution changes, trade association participation, and dealings with competitors who are also customers. Clearance work runs on a timetable set by the merger agreement and the agencies. Litigation and investigation work is driven by court schedules and government demands, and its cost is often dominated by document review and data analysis. Defining which of these you need, and for how long, lets the budget be built realistically.

Economists, data, and conflicts

Antitrust questions often turn on market facts that lawyers alone cannot supply, so retained economists are a regular part of the team in mergers and litigation. They need clean sales, cost, and pricing data, and the earlier the company identifies where that data lives, the less expensive the work becomes. Engaging consultants through counsel can help protect their work under the work-product doctrine, though protection is not automatic. Conflicts are another practical issue, because in concentrated industries many firms already represent a competitor, supplier, or customer of yours. Clearing conflicts early avoids losing counsel at a critical point.

Keeping advice useful and privileged

Antitrust advice works only if the business people who make decisions understand it, so it is often delivered as short guidance, training, or a review of specific documents rather than long memos. Requests for legal advice should go to counsel and be labeled as such, but a label alone does not create privilege, and business discussions with a lawyer merely copied are generally not protected. Training is most effective when it uses the company's own situations, such as a conversation at a trade show or a request from a distributor. In our first discussion we identify the immediate question, the people who will be our contacts, and how you want advice delivered and budgeted.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about antitrust practice and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.