Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Arbitration Between Insurance Companies

Your company paid a claim, and now it is trying to recover from the insurer of the party who caused the loss. Or two carriers disagree about which policy should respond. In many of these disputes, the path runs through arbitration instead of a courtroom.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Arbitration Between Insurance Companies: what usually happens

Where insurer-to-insurer arbitration comes from

Arbitration between insurance companies usually arises from agreements the carriers have made in advance. Many property and casualty insurers belong to inter-company arbitration programs that handle subrogation claims, such as recovering what was paid on an auto or property loss from the at-fault party's carrier. In New York, certain disputes between insurers over reimbursement of no-fault benefits are required by law to go to arbitration. Reinsurance contracts frequently contain their own arbitration clauses, often with panels made up of industry veterans and provisions that let the panel look beyond strict legal rules toward the commercial purpose of the agreement. Each of these settings has its own procedures and filing requirements.

What the record usually needs to show

A subrogation arbitration generally turns on liability and the amount paid, so the claim file, payment records, photographs, estimates, and statements carry most of the weight. Coverage disputes between carriers turn more on the policy language, other insurance clauses, and the timeline of notice and tender. In reinsurance matters, the underwriting file, the course of dealing between the parties, and claims handling records can all become relevant. Keep complete files, because some programs have limited exchange of information and decide cases largely on written submissions. Watch filing windows and program rules closely, since a missed deadline can bar recovery.

For policyholders and self-insured businesses

Individual policyholders are usually not parties to these arbitrations, but the outcome can matter to them, for example when recovery of a deductible depends on subrogation succeeding. Self-insured businesses and third-party administrators may participate in some programs and should understand the rules before a claim arises. When an inter-company decision is issued, options to challenge it are generally narrow. Initially, we look at which program or clause governs the dispute, what the file supports, and whether arbitration, negotiation, or court is the right forum for the issue at hand.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about arbitration between insurance companies and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.