Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims

A mass was visible on an earlier scan, a biopsy was read as benign, or an abnormal result never reached the patient. When cancer is found late, the first task is working out where in the chain of care the miss happened.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims: what usually happens

Where misses tend to occur

Delays in cancer diagnosis usually trace back to a handful of breakdowns. An imaging study or pathology slide may have been misread, a doctor may not have ordered a test that the symptoms called for, or an abnormal result may have been reported without any follow-up. Communication failures between a specialty office, a lab, and a primary care practice are a common thread, because each may assume someone else will act. Identifying which breakdown happened determines who may be responsible, whether an individual physician, a radiology or pathology group, a laboratory, or the hospital system that runs the follow-up process. Some providers are public entities, which brings its own early notice requirements.

Getting the medical picture reviewed

These claims depend on medical review. The original imaging and slides, not only the written reports, may need to be obtained so that another radiologist or pathologist can look at them. Request complete records from each provider, including test results, referral notes, and patient portal messages, and, with your lawyer's guidance, list every appointment and what you were told. New York generally requires that, before a malpractice suit is filed, the lawyer consult a physician and certify that there is a reasonable basis for the case. A reviewing physician also addresses the second half of the claim: how much the delay changed the course of the disease.

What we look at together

We start with the timeline: when symptoms were reported, which tests were done, what each result showed, and when the diagnosis was finally made. From there we identify which providers were involved and which records still have to be collected. Timing matters in these cases, and New York has a specific rule for when the time to sue begins in certain missed-cancer claims, so the dates of the original error and of its discovery both need attention. We will tell you candidly if the review suggests the outcome would likely have been the same. Patients still in treatment can stay focused on their care while we gather the records.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about cancer misdiagnosis claims and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.