Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Cartel Antitrust Litigation

Federal agents have executed a search warrant at a competitor, and the news says a price-fixing investigation is under way in your industry. Cartel antitrust litigation often begins with a criminal investigation and continues for years in civil courts.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Cartel Antitrust Litigation: what usually happens

Criminal and civil tracks

The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice can prosecute agreements among competitors to fix prices or rig bids as crimes. Civil class actions by purchasers usually follow, often soon after an investigation becomes public. Direct purchasers can generally bring federal damages claims, while indirect purchasers further down the chain usually rely on state laws, which vary. State attorneys general and foreign competition authorities may act as well. A company may be a target, a witness, or a victim, and sometimes more than one at once.

Leniency and early decisions

Federal prosecutors reward the first company that reports a cartel and cooperates through a leniency program, and companies that come forward later usually cannot obtain the same treatment. A federal statute can also reduce civil damages exposure for a leniency recipient that cooperates with civil plaintiffs. Because timing matters so much, a company that learns of possible collusion should investigate quickly through counsel. Employees should be told not to destroy documents or discuss the matter with competitors. Individuals may face criminal exposure apart from the company and may need their own counsel. Internal reviews in this setting often look at pricing communications, trade association contacts, and messaging apps used by sales staff.

For purchasers and for defendants

If your business bought products affected by a cartel, you may be a member of a pending class or may be able to pursue your own claim, which larger purchasers sometimes do. Keep purchase records, invoices, and contracts. Defendants face difficult questions about class certification, damages models, and coordination with the criminal case, and civil discovery may be limited while a criminal investigation proceeds. Whether a large purchaser opts out of a class usually depends on the volume of its purchases and the cost of separate litigation. Knowing your role, your exposure or claims, and the deadlines lets us map out the next steps with you.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about cartel antitrust litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.