Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Communications Litigation

A carrier that stopped paying for interconnection, a channel pulled from a cable lineup, a class action over marketing texts — communications litigation tends to sit where ordinary business disputes meet a heavy layer of regulation.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Communications Litigation: what usually happens

Disputes in a regulated industry

Telecommunications and media companies are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission and, for some services, by state agencies such as the New York Public Service Commission. That overlay shapes many disputes: some claims must go to a regulator first, some are preempted by federal law, and others proceed in court as ordinary contract or business claims. Recurring subjects include carriage and licensing agreements, access to poles and rights-of-way, billing disputes between carriers, and franchise issues with municipalities. Deciding early which body should hear a dispute can save a great deal of time and expense.

Claims over calls and texts

Businesses that market by phone or text often face suits under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which allows private lawsuits that frequently proceed as class actions. The Supreme Court has narrowed what counts as an autodialer, and lower courts have divided on related questions, including how the statute applies to text messages, so the current law in the relevant circuit needs to be checked. Consent records, opt-out handling, and vendor contracts are usually at the center of these cases. Consumers who receive unwanted calls or texts should save the messages, the numbers, and any opt-out requests they sent.

Building the file and the first steps

For business disputes, the key documents are the agreements between the parties, any tariffs or regulatory filings that apply, and the correspondence about the disagreement. Network and billing data may be central, and preserving it needs early attention because many systems overwrite records routinely. Early on, we work out whether the matter belongs before a regulator, in court, or in arbitration, and which deadlines apply. We also look at whether the dispute affects service to customers, since regulators may take an interest in any interruption.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about communications litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.