Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Compel Arbitration

You signed up for a service, took a job, or signed a commercial contract with an arbitration clause buried in it, and now the dispute is in court, or the other side wants it out of court. The question of where the case belongs often has to be answered before anything else.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Compel Arbitration: what usually happens

What a motion to compel actually asks

A motion to compel arbitration asks a court to send the dispute to the forum the contract names and, usually, to pause the lawsuit in the meantime. Federal law and New York law both strongly favor enforcing arbitration agreements, but the court still has to be satisfied that an agreement was formed and that it covers this dispute. Online agreements raise their own questions about whether the terms were actually presented and accepted. Many clauses also hand the question of scope to the arbitrator, which changes what a judge will decide. Some disputes are carved out by statute; for example, federal law lets a person bringing sexual harassment or sexual assault claims choose court despite a pre-dispute clause.

Records that tend to matter

Collect the version of the contract or terms that was in effect when the relationship began, along with any later versions and the notices that announced changes. For online agreements, the screens a user saw, the click or signature records, and the date of acceptance can be central. Keep any correspondence where either side discussed arbitration or chose to litigate instead. A party that pursues the case in court for a while can sometimes be found to have given up the right to arbitrate, so the history of what each side did matters. If you are the one hoping to stay in court, do not assume a clause is unenforceable just because it seems unfair.

Deciding the direction early

In a first conversation we read the clause itself: who administers the arbitration, who pays the fees, where it happens, and whether there is a class waiver. We talk about whether arbitration actually serves you, since cost, speed, privacy, and appeal rights all shift. If you were sued, we look at whether moving to compel should come before an answer, because some steps in litigation can be argued later as a waiver. If you are the one opposing arbitration, we look at formation and scope rather than general fairness. Either way, the timing of the first filing usually matters.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about compel arbitration and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.