Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Complex Litigation

The dispute involves multiple companies, a long history of records, or technical questions no single witness can explain, and it is clear this will not be an ordinary lawsuit.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Complex Litigation: what usually happens

What makes a case complex

Complex litigation is a practical label rather than a single legal category. It usually describes cases with many parties, related claims in several courts, large volumes of electronic data, or issues that require technical or financial analysis. Class actions, multidistrict litigation, shareholder and partnership disputes, construction defect cases, and large commercial contract disputes often fall into this group. Courts manage these cases actively, with scheduling orders, case management conferences, and sometimes special masters or referees. New York's Commercial Division and the federal courts each have procedures designed for this kind of case.

Discovery at scale

Electronic discovery tends to drive cost and timing. Early decisions about which custodians, systems, date ranges, and search methods to use can shape the entire case, and courts expect the parties to confer about them. A litigation hold has to reach everyone who might have relevant data, including former employees and outside vendors where possible. Technology-assisted review is commonly used to manage large document sets. Privilege review at that volume needs its own plan, and agreements with the other side about inadvertently produced privileged material are common. Retained witnesses in accounting, engineering, or industry practice are often needed, and their work has to be planned early to fit the court's schedule.

Planning the case as a project

Because complex litigation can run for a long time, we plan it like a project, with phases, budgets, and decision points. Early motions can narrow claims or parties, and settlement opportunities may arise at several stages. Coordinating with co-defendants or co-plaintiffs, insurers, and other counsel calls for clear agreements about cost sharing and confidentiality. At a first meeting, the focus is the core issues, the key data sources, and the obligations that cannot wait, such as preservation and responses already due. We then outline a realistic plan and revisit it as the case develops. Clients usually want regular reporting on spending against the budget, and we build that into the plan from the start.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about complex litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.