Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Compliance Agreement

Resolving an investigation by agreement can end the immediate threat. It also opens a period in which the company, and sometimes individual officers, operate under terms that someone outside the company is watching.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Compliance Agreement: what usually happens

The forms these agreements take

Compliance agreements show up in several settings. Prosecutors resolve some corporate cases through deferred prosecution or non-prosecution agreements, regulators use consent orders, and contractors facing suspension or debarment from federal work sometimes enter administrative agreements with the agency official handling the matter. The labels differ, but the core exchange is similar: the government holds back a harsher step, and the company commits to fixing the conditions behind the problem and to showing that it has. Terms are negotiated, and what is agreed at the start shapes how heavy the following period will be.

Obligations that run after signing

These agreements typically require program improvements and periodic reporting, and some add an independent monitor whose costs the company bears. Many now ask senior executives to certify compliance personally, which shifts attention to the individuals who sign. New misconduct, or a failure to report something the agreement says must be reported, can be treated as a breach. Depending on the agreement, the consequences can range from an extended term to prosecution or enforcement on the original conduct. Tracking each obligation with a named owner and a date is unglamorous work, but it is usually where these agreements are kept or lost. Reports submitted during the term are read closely, so they need to be accurate and complete rather than merely reassuring.

Before signing and after

If you are negotiating one, the drafting matters, particularly the definitions of what must be reported and what counts as a breach. If you are already operating under one, checking where each obligation stands before the agency asks is worth the effort. In either case we start by reading the agreement or draft against the company's actual capacity to perform it, and we look for obligations vague enough to be read against the company later. We also consider how the agreement interacts with other regulators, with contracting partners, and with any civil litigation over the same conduct.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about compliance agreement and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.