Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Corporate Litigation

The dispute is not with a customer or a competitor. It is inside the company: directors split over a decision, shareholders challenging how the board acted, or officers accused of putting their own interests first.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Corporate Litigation: what usually happens

Disputes about how a company is run

Corporate litigation in the narrower sense covers fights over a corporation's internal affairs, such as whether directors met their fiduciary duties, whether a merger or financing was fair to all shareholders, or whether a vote was valid. The law of the state where the company was incorporated generally governs these questions, even if the case is heard elsewhere. That is why a Delaware corporation headquartered in New York may face claims decided under Delaware law, sometimes in the Delaware Court of Chancery. Many charters and bylaws also contain clauses choosing the court for these disputes.

Records and requests that come first

These cases often begin with a demand to inspect books and records, which shareholders can use to investigate before suing. Boards receiving such a demand should respond with counsel, because how the company handles it can shape what follows. Preserve board minutes, materials circulated before meetings, and directors' communications, including personal email and texts used for company business. Directors who disagree with the majority sometimes want separate counsel, and the company's indemnification and advancement provisions, as well as its D&O insurance, should be reviewed early. Responding to a records demand also means deciding what confidentiality protections to require before producing anything.

Setting a course

In a first meeting we identify which state's law applies, where the dispute is likely to be heard, and whether the claims belong to individual shareholders or to the company itself, which affects who may bring them. We also look at what the board did and when, since the process behind a decision often matters as much as the decision in how courts review it. For the company and its directors, the strategy may involve a special committee, a negotiated resolution, or an early motion. For shareholders, it may begin with a records demand rather than a complaint. In closely held companies, these disputes often overlap with employment or buyout disagreements among the owners.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about corporate litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.