Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Cyber Litigation

A wire was diverted after a business email compromise, a former employee copied customer data on the way out, or an unknown party keeps scraping or attacking your systems, and you want to know what a court can actually do.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Cyber Litigation: what usually happens

Going after the people responsible

Cyber litigation is often thought of as defense, but companies also use the courts to respond to an attack. When the wrongdoer is anonymous, a lawsuit against unnamed defendants can allow subpoenas to email providers, hosting companies, or banks to identify them. Courts can issue emergency orders in some cases, for example to stop the movement of stolen funds or to take down infrastructure used in an attack. Claims against insiders and competitors can rely on trade secret law, contract terms, and computer misuse statutes. The Supreme Court has read the main federal anti-hacking law more narrowly in recent years, so an employee who misuses data they were permitted to access may not fit it, and other claims may be stronger.

Speed and evidence

Recovering diverted funds depends heavily on timing. Contact your bank immediately and ask it to recall the transfer and alert the receiving bank, report the incident to federal law enforcement, and then consider court action if funds can still be located. For intrusions, preserve logs, affected devices, and email headers, keeping systems in their current state while disconnecting them from the network rather than powering them down, and let forensic professionals handle collection under counsel's direction. For insider cases, secure the departing employee's devices and accounts without wiping them, and keep the access records that show what was taken and when.

Choosing whether to sue

A lawsuit is not always the right tool. Cyber litigation can expose details of your systems and the incident in public filings, and an anonymous defendant may be beyond the reach of any judgment. On the other hand, a court order can sometimes recover funds, stop ongoing harm, or establish facts that matter for insurance and regulators. We look at what you want to achieve, the evidence available, where the defendant or the money may be located, and whether insurance coverage or notification duties affect the timing. The plan should fit the goal, whether that is recovery, deterrence, or simply finding out who was responsible.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about cyber litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.