Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Dominance Compliance

Being the largest company in a market is not unlawful in the United States, but it changes how ordinary business practices are judged, and companies operating abroad face stricter versions of that scrutiny.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Dominance Compliance: what usually happens

How the U.S. and other systems differ

American antitrust law targets acquiring or maintaining monopoly power through exclusionary conduct, rather than size or high prices on their own. The European Union and many other jurisdictions, including Korea, use an abuse of dominance framework that can reach a broader range of conduct by firms with strong market positions. A company selling globally may find that a practice tolerated in one market draws scrutiny in another. Market share alone does not settle whether a company is dominant, and how the market is defined often matters as much as the share. State attorneys general, including New York's, also enforce antitrust laws and have taken an active interest in large platforms.

Practices that tend to draw attention

For firms with a strong position, contract terms that would be routine for a smaller competitor can raise questions. Exclusive dealing arrangements and loyalty discounts are common examples. Bundling products together, or refusing to deal with rivals in certain circumstances, can also draw scrutiny. Internal documents describing a goal of eliminating a competitor or locking up customers can color how regulators read otherwise defensible conduct. Keep records of the business reasons behind pricing and contract decisions as they are made, and train sales teams on how to describe competition in writing.

Building a program that fits

We begin by understanding the markets you sell in, your share and that of competitors, and where you operate outside the United States. From there we review contract templates, rebate programs, and distribution terms against the rules that apply in each key jurisdiction. If a regulator has already sent questions or a competitor has complained, we focus first on preserving documents and preparing a consistent response. Dominance compliance is less about a rulebook than about judgment, so we help identify which decisions should come to legal review before they are launched. The program should reflect your actual business rather than a generic antitrust checklist.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about dominance compliance and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.