Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Labor & Employment

Employment Defense

A charge from a civil rights agency, a wage complaint, and a demand letter from a former manager can arrive in the same quarter. Employment defense for a business starts with knowing which matter is which and what each one requires first.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Employment Defense: what usually happens

Sorting the matters that arrive

Employers in New York may hear from the EEOC, the state Division of Human Rights, the New York City Commission on Human Rights, the state Department of Labor, the federal Wage and Hour Division, or the National Labor Relations Board, as well as from lawyers for current or former employees. Each forum has its own response deadlines and procedures, and a short window to answer an agency is common. A position statement or an early letter can shape the whole matter, because it is often compared with what the company says later. Some notices, such as a subpoena or a document request in a wage audit, carry obligations that apply before anything has been decided. Treating each notice as routine paperwork is one of the more common mistakes.

Insurance, holds, and internal communication

Employment practices liability insurance often requires prompt notice of a claim, and late notice can complicate coverage, so check the policy as soon as something arrives. Put a litigation hold in place for the email, chat, phones, and HR files of the people involved, and suspend routine deletion. Limit internal discussion to those who need to know, and remind managers that retaliation against someone who filed a complaint is prohibited. If several employees raise similar issues, the matter may be heading toward a group claim, which changes the approach. Severance or separation agreements offered while a charge is pending should be reviewed, because a release cannot bar a person from filing with or assisting an agency.

Choosing a strategy for each matter

Some matters call for a full defense, some for early resolution, and many for a period of investigation before choosing. We review the documents, interview the decision-makers, and check whether arbitration agreements, releases, or prior settlements affect the claim. We also look at whether the issue reflects a policy or pay practice that should be corrected going forward, since fixing it can reduce later exposure. A first meeting aims for a clear plan for each open matter and its deadlines.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about employment defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.