Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Labor & Employment

Employment Litigation Defense

A former employee's lawyer sends a demand letter, an agency charge arrives in the mail, or a summons is served at the front desk. For an employer, the first steps in employment litigation defense often shape the rest of the case.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Employment Litigation Defense: what usually happens

The first things to handle

A lawsuit comes with a deadline to respond, and an agency charge usually comes with a deadline for a position statement, so the papers should go to counsel right away. If you carry employment practices liability insurance, notify the carrier promptly, because late notice can affect coverage and many policies control the choice of defense counsel. Issue a litigation hold to the people and systems that have relevant records, including email, messaging apps, personnel files, and payroll data. Instruct managers not to discuss the claim with the employee or with coworkers and not to take any action that could be seen as retaliation.

Building the employer's account

The core question in most cases is why the decision was made, and the documents created at the time usually carry more weight than explanations given later. Gather the personnel file, performance reviews, discipline records, policies the employee acknowledged, and the communications around the decision. Identify who made the decision and who influenced it, since a biased recommendation from someone below can create issues for the employer even if the final decision maker was neutral. Check whether an arbitration agreement exists and whether it was properly formed. A position statement given to an agency can later be used in court, so it should be accurate and consistent with the records.

Choosing a strategy

In a first meeting we assess the claims, the strength of the documentation, insurance coverage, and the likely cost of litigating through discovery. We talk about whether early resolution, mediation, a motion to dismiss, or a motion to compel arbitration makes sense, recognizing that these are business decisions as much as legal ones. We also look at whether the claim points to a policy or practice that should be corrected now, which can matter for other employees and for future claims. The goal is a plan that fits the company's priorities and that it can sustain through the life of the case.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about employment litigation defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.