Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Labor & Employment

ERISA Litigation

A retirement plan whose fees look high, a pension calculation that does not add up, a plan sponsor facing a demand letter from participants — ERISA litigation reaches well beyond a single denied claim.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

ERISA Litigation: what usually happens

The main kinds of ERISA cases

The federal law known as ERISA governs most private-sector employee benefit plans, including retirement plans, pensions, and many health and disability plans. Some cases are claims for benefits by a participant or beneficiary. Others are fiduciary breach cases, where participants claim that the people running a plan failed to act prudently or loyally, for example in choosing investments or monitoring fees; these are often brought as class actions on behalf of the plan. There are also claims about interference with benefits and retaliation, and disputes between plans and service providers. Government plans and most church plans are generally outside ERISA, and those disputes follow different rules.

How ERISA cases are different from ordinary lawsuits

ERISA largely displaces state-law claims related to covered plans, so a case that looks like breach of contract or bad faith is often treated as an ERISA claim instead. Remedies are more limited than in many civil cases, and jury trials are generally not available. In benefit cases, the plan's internal appeal is usually required first, and the court often reviews the plan's decision based on the record assembled there. In fiduciary cases, the plan documents, committee minutes, and investment policy statements tend to be the core evidence, and plan sponsors facing claims should preserve those materials immediately and notify any fiduciary insurance carrier.

Where we start

For participants, we ask for the plan document, the summary plan description, account statements, and any correspondence with the plan. You have a right to request many plan documents, and the plan has to respond. For plan sponsors and fiduciaries, we review governance records, the service provider arrangements, and the demand or complaint, then consider whether a response to the claims, a review of plan practices, or both is warranted. In either role, the first conversation sets out what kind of claim this really is, because that determines the forum, the standard of review, and how long the matter may take.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about erisa litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.