Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Labor & Employment

Harassment Defense

A complaint has been made against your company, or against you personally, and an internal investigation or an agency charge is underway. Harassment defense in the workplace begins before any lawsuit, with how the response is handled.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Harassment Defense: what usually happens

Two different defendants

Workplace harassment claims can name the employer, the individual accused, or both, and their interests do not always line up. An employer may need to investigate and act, while the accused employee wants to be heard and may face discipline or termination. Under New York law, individuals can sometimes be held personally liable, for example for aiding and abetting, so an accused manager may need advice separate from the company's lawyer. A criminal harassment charge is a different matter handled in criminal court, and it should not be confused with a workplace claim, although the same events can lead to both.

How the standard has shifted

New York no longer requires harassment to be severe or pervasive to be unlawful; the state and city laws focus on whether someone was treated less well because of a protected characteristic, with room for a defense that the conduct amounted only to petty slights or trivial inconveniences. An employer's internal complaint process still matters, but an employee's failure to use it is not by itself decisive under New York law. Federal law still uses a different standard, and a defense built on policies and prompt corrective action has more room there. The same facts can therefore be judged differently depending on which law a claim relies on.

Preparing a careful response

Preserve email, chat, and texts from everyone involved, and suspend routine deletion. For employers, the quality of the investigation is often the center of the defense: who conducted it, whether witnesses were interviewed fairly, and whether the outcome followed the evidence. Accused employees should not contact the complainant about the complaint and should be careful in group chats. Anything said in an internal interview or an agency submission should be accurate and carefully reviewed, since it is likely to be compared with later testimony. In a first meeting we look at the claims made, who is likely to be named, insurance coverage, and whether a resolution, a defense on the merits, or both should be pursued.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about harassment defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.