Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Hostile Takeover

The letter is addressed to the board, offers a premium, and makes clear that the bidder will go to shareholders directly if the directors will not engage. That is how a hostile takeover often begins.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Hostile Takeover: what usually happens

How an unsolicited bid unfolds

A bidder who cannot reach agreement with the board has a few paths. It can make a tender offer directly to shareholders, run a proxy contest to replace directors with a slate more open to a sale, or combine the two. Before either, a bidder often builds a stake, and crossing certain ownership levels requires public disclosure. Making a private approach public is a common way to press the board through its shareholder base. The target's charter, bylaws, and state corporate law shape what a bidder can do and how quickly, and many structural defenses depend on what was already in place.

The board's process becomes the record

Courts reviewing defensive measures tend to look at how the board decided, not only at what it decided. Directors who inform themselves, rely on independent financial and legal advice, and weigh the offer against the company's own prospects stand on firmer ground than a board that rejects a bid reflexively. Minutes, board materials, and advisors' analyses become the evidence if shareholders sue. Directors should avoid side conversations with the bidder and keep communications in the company's designated channels. Conflicts, such as management's interest in keeping their positions, need to be identified and handled, sometimes through a committee of independent directors.

Decisions in the first days

The early choices concern posture and communication: whether to respond publicly, whether to meet the bidder, whether to explore alternatives such as another buyer, and whether to adopt or adjust defensive measures like a rights plan. If a tender offer is launched, the company is generally required to state its position to shareholders within a set period. If we represent a bidder, the questions run the other way: how to build a position within the disclosure rules, how the target's defenses might be challenged, and whether a negotiated deal is still within reach. Either way, we start by reading the governing documents and the applicable state law, because they define the field everything else happens on.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about hostile takeover and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.