Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Joint Venture

Two companies find they need each other for one project, one market, or one product, and neither wants to merge with the other. A joint venture is the usual answer, and the paperwork decides how it ends as much as how it starts.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Joint Venture: what usually happens

Contract or new company

Some joint ventures are purely contractual, with each side keeping its own assets and agreeing how work and revenue are shared. Others form a new entity, often an LLC, that the partners own together and run through an operating agreement. The choice affects liability, taxes, how staff are hired, and who owns what the venture creates. Where the partners compete in the same industry, the arrangement can draw antitrust attention, particularly around sharing pricing or customer information, and larger ventures may require a filing with federal antitrust agencies before they close. A foreign partner can add national security review in certain sensitive sectors.

Contributions and control

Write down exactly what each party is bringing: cash, equipment, licenses, people, customer relationships, or know-how. Intellectual property deserves particular care, both what is licensed into the venture and what the venture develops, because ownership disputes after a breakup are common and costly. Governance terms matter as much as percentages. A minority partner may hold veto rights over budgets, new partners, or major contracts, and those rights can shape the venture more than the ownership split does. Keep the term sheets, emails about expectations, and any side letters, so that the definitive documents capture them rather than leaving them floating.

Deadlock and the way out

Equal partners will eventually disagree, and a venture without a deadlock mechanism can stall indefinitely. Agreements commonly provide escalation to senior executives, mediation or arbitration, and buy-sell mechanisms that let one party purchase the other's interest. Exit terms should address a change of control at one of the partners, a breach, or the project simply running its course, and who keeps the employees, customers, and technology afterward. In a first conversation we look at the commercial goal, the structure that fits it, and the points where your interests and your partner's most clearly diverge. Those are the terms worth negotiating hardest, because they are the ones that get tested.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about joint venture and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.