Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Joint Venture Dispute Resolution

The venture's board is split, the partners have stopped returning each other's calls, and the business is drifting. Before anyone files anything, the agreement itself usually lays out a path, and following it carefully is part of the strategy.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Joint Venture Dispute Resolution: what usually happens

The machinery inside the agreement

Well-drafted joint venture agreements anticipate disagreement. Many require escalation, first between the venture's managers and then between senior executives of each partner, before any formal proceeding. Deadlock provisions may follow, including buy-sell mechanisms in which one partner names a price and the other decides whether to buy or sell at it, or put and call options triggered by defined events. Mediation is sometimes mandatory before arbitration or litigation can begin. Some agreements also let an independent third party decide narrow technical or valuation questions. Each step can carry its own notice and timing requirements, and a misstep can hand the other partner a procedural argument.

Preparing before anything is triggered

Invoking a deadlock or buy-sell clause can be irreversible, so preparation matters. Collect the joint venture agreement, the entity's governing documents, board minutes, and the correspondence showing where the disagreement began. Model what a buy-sell price would mean for each side, including whether you could finance a purchase if the other partner elects to sell. Understand which assets, licenses, or employees depend on each partner, since that dependence often shapes leverage. Keep the business running in the ordinary course during this period, and avoid unilateral actions that the agreement reserves for joint approval.

Choosing a route deliberately

In an initial review we lay out which steps the agreement requires and in what order, and whether any step has already been triggered or waived by conduct. We consider whether a negotiated restructuring or exit is realistic before formal remedies are used. If arbitration or court proceedings are likely, we look at interim relief that could protect the venture's assets and confidential information while the dispute is pending. Joint venture dispute resolution goes better when the route is chosen deliberately, rather than letting the first notice sent by either side dictate the shape of the conflict.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about joint venture dispute resolution and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.