Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Labor & Employment

Non Compete Litigation

A former employer has filed for a temporary restraining order, or your company is deciding whether to go to court to stop a departing employee. Non compete litigation moves faster at the start than most lawsuits.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Non Compete Litigation: what usually happens

Why the opening hearing carries so much weight

Many of these cases begin with a request for emergency relief, such as a temporary restraining order followed by a preliminary injunction hearing. At that stage a court weighs how likely the restriction is to be enforced and whether the harm claimed could be fixed later with money, often on a compressed record of affidavits and documents. New York courts enforce a restriction only as far as it reasonably protects a legitimate interest, such as trade secrets or client relationships, and they may narrow an overbroad clause rather than strike it entirely. The outcome of an early hearing frequently shapes whether and how the case settles.

Where the law stands

New York has relied on court-made reasonableness rules rather than a general statutory ban, and legislative proposals to restrict non-competes have been debated, so the current status should be checked when a case starts. The federal rule that would have barred most non-competes was set aside in court and is not in effect. Other states take very different approaches, and California generally refuses to enforce them, so choice-of-law and forum clauses can become a major fight. Related restrictions, like non-solicitation and confidentiality terms, are often easier to enforce and frequently carry the case.

Preparing either side

For a departing employee, the most damaging facts are often digital: files downloaded before leaving, contacts exported, or messages to clients. Do not delete anything, and tell your lawyer about anything that was moved. The new employer may be named too, and its onboarding steps can matter. How the employment ended can also bear on enforcement, and some New York decisions have given weight to a termination without cause. For the company bringing the case, a forensic review and a clear explanation of the interest being protected usually come before filing. In a first meeting we read the agreement, review the timeline, and discuss whether negotiation, a narrowed agreement, or a court fight fits the situation.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about non compete litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.