Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Software Litigation

The new system went live late and still does not work, a vendor shut off access during a billing dispute, or a former developer claims the code is his. Software disputes mix contract language with technical facts that few judges see every day.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Software Litigation: what usually happens

Where software disputes come from

Many software disputes grow out of development or implementation projects where the delivered product did not meet the specifications or the schedule. Others involve SaaS agreements, including uptime commitments, access to data when the contract ends, and price increases. License disputes cover whether a customer exceeded its permitted users or installations, and open-source issues arise when code is used outside its license terms. Ownership questions are common when outside developers wrote the code, because under U.S. copyright law, work by an independent contractor usually needs a written assignment before the client owns it. Data loss, security incidents, and integration failures can add claims against several vendors at once.

Preserve the technical trail

Software litigation depends heavily on records created during the project. Keep the contract, statements of work, change orders, specifications, and acceptance documents, along with project tickets, emails, chat channels, meeting notes, and test results. Code repositories and their commit history can show who wrote what and when. Once a dispute is reasonably likely, routine deletion of messages or repositories should be suspended. Avoid copying a vendor's proprietary materials or logging into systems after your access rights end, even to gather evidence. If the other side hosts a system that holds your data, ask your lawyer about requesting an export or a preservation commitment early.

Contract terms and the immediate need

Our review starts with the contract terms that usually control these disputes, including acceptance procedures, warranties, limits of liability, termination rights, and dispute resolution provisions, which often call for mediation or arbitration. We consider whether the immediate need is technical, such as recovering data or keeping a system running, or financial. We discuss whether an independent technical reviewer would help clarify what went wrong, and whether a negotiated transition makes more sense than a lawsuit. If intellectual property is at stake, we look at registrations, assignments, and any license that may already exist.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about software litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.