Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Supreme Court Appeal

Someone told you to take the case to the supreme court. In New York that phrase can mean something quite different from what it means in most states, so the first task is working out which court and which kind of review you are talking about.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Supreme Court Appeal: what usually happens

New York's naming puzzle

In New York, the Supreme Court is the main trial court for civil cases, not the highest court. Appeals from it usually go to one of the four departments of the Appellate Division, and the state's highest court is the Court of Appeals. Review in the Court of Appeals is available as of right in limited situations and otherwise requires permission. In most other states, the court called the supreme court is the top court, and review there is often discretionary. The United States Supreme Court sits above all of these, and when it reviews a state court decision it considers questions of federal law; it agrees to hear a small fraction of the cases presented to it.

Asking a high court to take the case

Discretionary review usually begins with a petition or motion explaining why the case matters beyond the parties, such as a conflict among lower courts or a significant unsettled legal question. A high court is generally not looking to correct ordinary errors; that is the role of the intermediate appellate court. For the United States Supreme Court, the request is a petition for a writ of certiorari, which is due within a set period after the lower court's judgment or the denial of rehearing. Extensions are possible but limited, and the preparation is substantial. New York's own leave procedure has short deadlines that run from service of the decision with notice of entry.

Deciding whether to try

The first step is reading the decision you want reviewed and identifying which court has authority over it. We then look at whether the issue was preserved below, whether it presents the kind of question a high court takes, and what pursuing it would cost in time and money. If the realistic path is an intermediate appeal rather than a top court, we say so. Interim relief, such as a stay of enforcement while review is sought, may also need to be requested. We do not predict whether a court will grant review, but we give you a clear view of the steps and deadlines before you decide.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about supreme court appeal and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.