Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Takeover Defense

There is no bid yet, but a fund has been buying shares and asking for meetings with management. Takeover defense is far easier to plan before the board is under pressure than after an offer lands.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Takeover Defense: what usually happens

Preparing before a bid

Much of takeover defense is a review of what the company already has in place. Charter and bylaw provisions on director elections, special meetings, written consents, and advance notice of nominations affect how quickly a bidder or activist can act. Many companies keep a shareholder rights plan drafted and ready rather than in force, since a standing plan can draw criticism from investors and proxy advisers. Monitoring trading activity and ownership filings helps the board see an approach coming. The state of incorporation matters a great deal, because the law on defensive measures differs among states, and New York corporations do not follow the same rules as Delaware ones. Activists sometimes seek a few board seats rather than control, and the response to that kind of campaign differs from the response to a full bid.

Fiduciary duties shape every step

Directors facing a takeover attempt have to act in good faith and on an informed basis, and courts often look harder at defensive measures than at ordinary business decisions. In Delaware, measures that block a bid generally must be reasonable in relation to the threat posed, and once a sale of control is underway the focus shifts toward obtaining value for shareholders. A careful process led by independent directors, and documented as it happens, is often what holds up later. Measures that appear designed mainly to keep management in place tend to draw the closest scrutiny.

When a bid or campaign arrives

An unsolicited offer, a proxy contest, or a consent solicitation each calls for a different response, and the first public statement often sets the tone. The board does not always have to negotiate, but it usually needs to consider a serious offer with care. Disclosure obligations for public companies continue throughout, and communications should be coordinated so that management, directors, and advisers say the same thing. A first session with us usually covers the company's governing documents, its shareholder base, and any recent approaches, and settles which preparations make sense now.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about takeover defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.