Meritz Securities PF fee refund battle… Market “A case of interest adjustment amid PF recession”
2019year PF Legal battle underway over loan advisory fees “Advisory area Securities company share, In most cases, refund claims are not established.”Revenue impact is limited…Internal control and contingent liability management are tasks Meritz Securities has passed. 2019Real estate project financing executed in 2018(PF) Development company VC Babylon was involved in the financial advisory fee received during the loan process. ‘Request for refund of unjust enrichment’ A lawsuit is in progress.. Currently, Meritz Securities' financial and internal control risks are all in domestic real estate. PFThe situation is focused on. However, the securities industry and legal community say that this lawsuit is related to Meritz Securities. PF It is assessed that the direct impact on the overall business is likely to be limited..The surface issue of this lawsuit is PF It is a financial advisory fee determined during the loan process.. However, in the market, this is not a simple individual dispute. PF It is interpreted as an extension of the process of adjusting interests between developers and financial companies following the market downturn.. Accordingly, the key issue in this case is 5door5I summarized it with the answer.◆ How do the securities industry and legal circles view the core of this lawsuit? The industry does not view this lawsuit simply as an individual dispute between Meritz Securities and the developer.. recent PF As the market has passed the past boom phase and entered a recession and adjustment phase, there is a continuing movement to look again at past contract structures and fee systems.. In a situation where business conditions have worsened, developers are showing moves to readjust cost burdens., The financial sector is fighting back by maintaining that the fees were received legally under the contract..Securities industry officials commented on this atmosphere. AMr. “today PF As the market is experiencing a recession compared to the past, the developer appears to be making various attempts to improve the situation.”as “However, if there are no problems in the contract process and it is clear that the developer has agreed to it, it will not be easy to claim a refund for the fee payment.”Diagnosed as.Whether or not the developer agrees is a key issue in related lawsuits.. In the legal profession, recently PF There is also an analysis that there are many cases in which securities firms side with lawsuits claiming the return of unjust enrichment for financial advisory fees in loans.. This is related to PF The legal world explains that in many loan contracts, the fact that the developer expressed consent to the details is confirmed in the contract..Kwangdeok Kim, general attorney at Daeryun Law Firm, said: “Financial advice PF This is a matter in which the ratio is set based on an agreement with the developer before contract execution and construction commencement as the securities company's own specialized work within the contract.”saying “The financial advisory commission rate is established on the premise of obtaining the developer's consent to the securities company's professional judgment, and this becomes effective upon signing the contract.”explained.◆ PF How is the financial advisory fee rate setting process structured? To understand this issue, PF It is necessary to first look at the structure in which financial advisory fees are determined.. In the industry PF The loan advisory fee rate is related to the risk of the business., Funding Difficulty, market situation, There is an explanation that it is often decided based on the scope of the role of the financial company.. Ultimately, the commission rate is a result of reflecting business risk rather than a simple cost item..Securities industry insider BMr. “PF The decision to set the commission rate within a loan is made by analyzing the business location and structure of the contract loan and presenting the results reflecting this to the developer as a commission rate to obtain consent.”mentioned.◆ This lawsuit is from Meritz Securities PF What is the impact on the business profit structure? The industry-wide view is relatively consistent.. This lawsuit is from Meritz Securities. PF The possibility of immediately bringing about significant changes to the overall business strategy is limited.. If it is determined that there is no problem with the commission rate setting and contract procedures in this trial, Meritz Securities' existing PF It is unlikely that the business structure will be greatly shaken.. The industry has seen a rise in the frequency of these types of lawsuits this year. PF There are voices saying that it will gradually decrease in line with the trend of reducing non-performing loans in the market..Of course, some burden may arise depending on the results of individual cases, but the industry PF It is not viewed as a variable that can shake up the profit structure.. Rather, regarding this lawsuit PF The interpretation is that it is a dispute resolution process that occurs when a market recession enters a state of adjustment..Securities industry insider CMr. “2026year PF The frequency of related lawsuits is also expected to decrease in the market.”as “This is more important than the risk of individual securities companies. PF This is due to the focus on strengthening the soundness of the market, and there are growing expectations of a reduction in the non-performing loan market.”said.mudfish “A lawsuit like this PF This is an example of an adjustment that occurs when the market transitions from a boom phase to a recession phase in the past. If the market had maintained a boom, it is highly likely that the issue would not have been raised.”added.◆ What should the market look at together?Apart from the lawsuit, what the market is paying more attention to is Meritz Securities' PF Internal control and contingent liability management. Meritz Securities 2019year 10In relation to the new residential-commercial complex construction project in Daegu in February PF In the process of performing financial advisory and arrangement services, deficiencies in internal control were discovered. 2025has been subject to sanctions related to. At the time, the Financial Supervisory Service PF In relation to the charge of the team leader using undisclosed information, the Capital Markets Act54A reprimand was issued based on the article..Currently, Meritz Securities PF real estate, including announcing a reduction plan to manage the increase in contingent liabilities. PF Focusing on reducing exposure.Korea Credit Rating last year 10Through a report from Meritz Securities “Most of our contingent liabilities are domestic real estate PFis focused on”Even though I point out “However, the proportion of Seoul and the metropolitan area is high and the collateral recognition ratio is high.(LTV) Considering such factors, there is a high possibility of reduction.”Highly evaluated.Meritz Securities real estate PF It is interpreted that the challenges faced in business will be financial soundness and internal control capabilities, not legal risks.. Separately from this lawsuit, Meritz Securities PF The need to conduct self-examination of the overall business structure and contract structure is being emphasized..◆ What to look forward to in the future The symbolic meaning of similar disputes may vary depending on how the court organizes its judgment on the securities company's commission rate setting and the developer's consent structure in this lawsuit..PF The market estimates that a significant number of businesses in the metropolitan area have entered the liquidation stage, but in regional areas, there are still unsold and unorganized businesses, so it is expected that it will take some time to completely resolve the possibility of disputes..The Financial Services Commission 2025end of year domestic PF The size of exposure 1branch 191In the garden 3branch 178decreased to trillion won and new PF He also urged active participation from the industry, saying that supply is continuing mainly from businesses with good business prospects.. The securities industry PF the market 2026He explained that if the stable situation is maintained in 2020, similar lawsuits are also likely to decrease..However, the securities firm has been reduced PF In the process of pursuing profits in the market, it is expected that it will be difficult to be excluded from the relevant inspection by the authorities as it is impossible to be free from the commission rate setting process and internal control..In the end, Meritz Securities PF The core of the lawsuit for refund of financial advisory fees is the stagnation rather than the win or loss of individual cases. PF The focus is on how the interests between developers and securities firms are being readjusted in the market.. The industry said that this lawsuit was filed by Meritz Securities. PF Although we believe that the impact on the business profit structure will be limited, we maintain the view that internal control and contingent liability management capabilities need to be separately inspected..In this lawsuit, the factors to pay attention to are condensed into three.. direction of court judgment, PF speed of market recovery, of the authorities PF Market management principle. For this reason, the enforcement and securities industries are keeping a keen eye on the outcome of future trials..NSPCommunications Reporter Lim Seong-su(forest@nspna.com) [View full article]
Meritz Securities PF fee refund battle… Market “A case of interest adjustment amid PF recession” (link)