CONTENTS
- 1. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Meaning

- - Definition of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act
- 2. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Types

- - Representative Examples of Acts Violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act
- 3. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Punishment Standards

- - Level of Punishment
- - Sentencing Guidelines
- 4. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Methods of Response

- - Confirming the Content of the Charge and the Applicable Legal Provisions
- - Organizing the Facts for the Investigative Response
- - Preparing Materials That Correspond to Sentencing Factors
- - Considering a Criminal Deposit Where Unavoidable
- - Preparing for the Upcoming Trial
- 5. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Finding It Difficult to Respond Alone?

1. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Meaning

A violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act refers to an act that violates an obligation or prohibition set forth in the "Electronic Financial Transactions Act," which is the law governing financial transactions conducted by electronic means.
Definition of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act
The Electronic Financial Transactions Act is a law that governs financial transactions using electronic devices such as computers, ATMs, and telephones, and sets forth matters concerning the operation and supervision of the electronic financial business.
Its purpose is to clarify the procedures and legal relationships of financial transactions that use electronic payment instruments, such as electronic funds transfers and electronic currency, thereby protecting users and securing the safety of electronic financial transactions.
2. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Types

Acts that violate the Electronic Financial Transactions Act can be used in a representative manner for voice phishing crimes.
Opening a so-called burner account and using it for a crime is also included among acts that violate the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.
Matters related to this are specified in the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and under Article 6, Paragraph 3, the following acts are prohibited.
▶ Electronic Financial Transactions Act, Article 6, Paragraph 3
2. Borrowing or lending an access medium while demanding or promising consideration
3. Borrowing or lending an access medium with the purpose of using it for a crime, or while knowing that it will be used for a crime
4. Using an access medium as the object of a pledge
5. Arranging, brokering, or advertising the acts under Items 1 through 4, or soliciting them while demanding or promising consideration
Representative Examples of Acts Violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act
▷
▷ Providing an access medium despite being aware that it would be used for a crime
3. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Punishment Standards
With respect to violations of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, in 2024, the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court prepared a plan to raise the sentencing guidelines, taking into account the seriousness of the offense and concerns about recidivism.
The statutory penalty, which had previously been "imprisonment for up to 3 years," was strengthened to "imprisonment for up to 5 years," adjusting it so that heavier punishment is possible.
If a charge of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act is established, the following criminal punishment may be imposed.
Level of Punishment
▷ Level of Punishment for Violations of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act
Electronic Financial Transactions Act, Article 49 (Penalty Provisions) | Imprisonment for up to 5 years or a fine of up to 30 million won |
In addition, where a person delivers an access medium (such as a bankbook or check card) to a criminal organization and goes so far as to participate in a voice phishing offense, the crime of fraud and other offenses may also apply beyond the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and the sentence may be aggravated.
▷ Level of Punishment for the Crime of Fraud
Criminal Act, Article 347 (Fraud) | Imprisonment for up to 20 years or a fine of up to 50 million won |
Sentencing Guidelines
▷ Mere participation (in the case of an organized offense)
▷ Diminished mental capacity
▷ Surrender, internal reporting, or a complete and voluntary disclosure of the full details of the offense (in the case of an organized offense)
▷ Cases in which the risk of a subsequent crime did not materialize due to a voluntary suspension of transactions or a report of loss
▷ Passive participation
▷ A crime committed to make a living
▷ Cases in which the actual gain is nonexistent or minor
▷ Sincere reflection
▷ No prior record of criminal punishment
▷ General cooperation with the investigation
▷ Recovery of the damage from the subsequent crime, or the victim's wish not to have the offender punished
4. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Methods of Response

If you become involved in a charge of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, you should promptly secure relevant evidence and prepare a systematic response strategy.
In particular, where it is difficult to argue that there is no charge, it is important to minimize one's degree of involvement as much as possible and to request leniency.
Confirming the Content of the Charge and the Applicable Legal Provisions
If you become subject to punishment for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, you should first identify the legal provisions that may apply to your conduct and the specific content of the charge.
For example, if you transferred or lent an access medium (such as a bankbook or card), Article 6, Paragraph 3 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act may apply, and this becomes subject to criminal punishment under Article 49.
It is important to examine in advance whether one's own conduct is legally unlawful.
Organizing the Facts for the Investigative Response
Before appearing at the investigative agency, you should organize the following matters in detail.
In addition, so that there is no confusion during the statement process, preparation in advance is necessary in order to maintain consistency in the content of your statement.
It is advantageous to make notes, organized by date and by situation, of who proposed the matter and in what manner, and what role you yourself played.
▶ Whether a bank account was opened and delivered
▶ Whether consideration was received, and so on
Preparing Materials That Correspond to Sentencing Factors
If there are factors favorable to sentencing, such as a basic purpose of making a living, whether it is a first offense, or efforts to recover the damage, you should prepare materials that can prove them.
If you organize in detail the content of attempts to reach a settlement with the victim, the fact of any deposit, circumstances such as financial hardship or illness, and a sincere letter of reflection, these can later serve as mitigating factors in the investigation or trial.
However, the submission of false materials may instead work to your disadvantage, so they should be prepared carefully and based on the facts.
Considering a Criminal Deposit Where Unavoidable
If a settlement with the victim is difficult or contact with the victim has been lost, you can express an intention to recover the damage through the criminal deposit system.
This is a procedure of depositing with the court an amount of money equivalent to the amount of the damage, and even if the actual victim does not receive it, it may be recognized as a factor to be considered for the reduction of the sentence at trial.
A deposit can be made by applying directly to the court or through an official depository, and you should prepare the deposit statement and the certificate of payment of the deposit money.
Preparing for the Upcoming Trial
If you are indicted and a criminal trial proceeds, it is important to organize the facts and the sentencing arguments and submit them in writing, and to approach the trial with a sincere attitude.
Retracting statements or showing an insincere attitude can adversely affect the court's judgment, so you should maintain consistent facts and an attitude of reflection from the outset.
It is advisable to argue, with supporting grounds, the circumstances that are favorable to you (for example, surrender, a crime committed to make a living, or passive participation).
5. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act | Finding It Difficult to Respond Alone?
Where a charge of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act has been raised, a prompt and systematic response from the early stage of the case is more important than anything.
Along with an accurate understanding of the facts, it is necessary to objectively analyze the gravity of the charge and to approach the matter strategically.
This firm has a number of attorneys with an average of 10 or more years of experience, and provides response strategies tailored to the client's situation.
In particular, through advance adjustment of the direction of statements and the organization of anticipated questions, the firm thoroughly prepares so that unfavorable statements do not arise during the investigation, thereby protecting the client's rights.
In addition, by collaborating with its own evidence investigation center and digital forensics center, the firm systematically carries out the collection and analysis of evidence, thereby building an effective defense.
If you are experiencing difficulty in responding to punishment for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, you may request a consultation with a criminal defense attorney.
See More
Watch related video content
for this case study.
Actual client recording | Suspect police investigation simulation












