[Wonju Obscenity via Telecommunication Media Attorney Type 1 and 2 Disposition Case] Wonju Obscenity via Telecommunication Media Attorney Type 1 and Type 2 Disposition Case

The client said that the client had compared reviews of several Wonju obscenity via telecommunication media attorneys before visiting Daeryun.

Although the client actually resided in Wonju, out of concern for the child the client had visited several places for consultations, and there had also been a retention suggestion from another office claiming it could obtain a suspension of indictment.

However, at Daeryun, the attorney with extensive experience in obscenity via telecommunication media cases participated in the consultation in person,

and the attorney clearly pointed out that in this case a suspension of indictment was very difficult, and that, while the firm would do its utmost on the case,

consulting in a tone that seemed to firmly guarantee a result that is hard to assure was an act of deceiving a client who was anxious about the case.

Because of this candid attitude of the attorney, the client became confident in the retention.

To minimize harm to the child, from immediately after the Wonju obscenity via telecommunication media attorney was retained, all contact from agencies such as the police

was arranged to be routed through the attorney, minimizing the mental stress the child could experience.

In addition, when the child attended school, police investigation schedules were coordinated for weekends or after school so that there would be no harm to the child's studies.

Because the client was worried first and foremost about harm coming to the child, Daeryun paid particular

attention to this.

Beyond the overall minimization of harm in the case, the response also had to be solid. The obscenity via telecommunication media provision was not a minor matter,

so careful review was needed, and a settlement with the victim was also a difficult situation. That the child did not have

accurate knowledge about sex, that the child was sincerely reflecting on the conduct, that the likelihood of reoffending was low, and that the child was generally a diligent student were points proven through various materials,

on the basis of which a statement of opinion was prepared.

If, as a result of the hearing, the juvenile court judge finds that a protective disposition is necessary, the judge shall, by decision, impose one of the dispositions falling under any of the following subparagraphs.

1. Entrustment of custody to the guardian or to a person who can protect the juvenile in place of the guardian

2. Order to attend a course

3. Community service order

4. Short-term probation by a probation officer

5. Long-term probation by a probation officer

6. Entrustment of custody to a child welfare facility under the Child Welfare Act or to another juvenile protection facility

7. Entrustment to a hospital, a sanatorium, or a medical rehabilitation juvenile reformatory under the Act on the Treatment of Protected Juveniles

8. Referral to a juvenile reformatory for up to one month

9. Short-term referral to a juvenile reformatory

10. Long-term referral to a juvenile reformatory

The client was very worried throughout the progress of the case and expressed many negative concerns about what would happen if the child were referred to a juvenile reformatory.

Each time, the Wonju obscenity via telecommunication media attorney responded calmly and presented a logical defense.

The result came about 5 months after the retention, and a Type 1 and Type 2 protective disposition was issued.

The child received only the lightest of the dispositions available. The client was very satisfied and relieved.

The child also reflected on the conduct and resolved never to commit a crime again. If you are looking for an obscenity via telecommunication media attorney in Wonju, you may contact Daeryun, which has offices throughout the country and attorneys with specialized expertise.