Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Deals & Cases

Violation of the Road Traffic Act (failure to take measures)

[Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney Non-Referral Case] The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney Obtained a Finding of No Suspicion of Crime

The client who came to the Wonju traffic accident attorney and entrusted the case came to be investigated by the police on a charge of violating the Road Traffic Act. In response, the client received a consultation in order to seek the assistance of the traffic accident attorney.

CONTENTS
  • 1. The Client Who Came to the Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney
    • - The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Participation in the Consultation
  • 2. Hit-and-Run as Explained by the Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney
    • - Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Guide to the Road Traffic Act
    • - Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Review of the Client's Case
  • 3. The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Case Result
    • - The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Non-Referral Conclusion

1. The Client Who Came to the Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney

While looking for a Wonju traffic accident attorney for a consultation before being investigated by the police, the client visited Daeryun. The client had been entirely unaware that a traffic accident had occurred and learned of the case only after receiving a call from the police.

The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Participation in the Consultation

The Wonju traffic accident attorney participated directly in the consultation and communicated with the client.

The client had no prior conviction for the same type of offense but had a prior conviction for drunk driving, had not yet been investigated by the police, and had been entirely unaware of the accident.

On the basis of this consultation, the traffic accident attorney developed a defense strategy.

2. Hit-and-Run as Explained by the Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney

The crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, commonly known as hit-and-run. The Wonju traffic accident attorney will explain 'hit-and-run' in detail together with the legal provisions.

Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Guide to the Road Traffic Act

The purpose of the Road Traffic Act, as the Wonju traffic accident attorney describes it in this case, is set out below.

• Article 1 (Purpose) The purpose of this Act is to prevent and remove all dangers and obstructions arising in road traffic and to secure safe and smooth traffic.

Within that statute, the provision that addresses hit-and-run is the following provision.

• Article 54 (Measures upon Occurrence of an Accident) ① Where a person has been killed or injured or property has been damaged (hereinafter referred to as a "traffic accident") due to the operation of a vehicle or streetcar or other traffic, the driver of that vehicle or streetcar or other crew member (hereinafter referred to as the "driver, etc.") shall immediately stop and take the following measures.

1. Measures necessary to aid the casualties


2. Provision of personal information (name, telephone number, address, and the like; the same shall apply hereinafter in Articles 148 and 156, subparagraph 10) to the victim

• Article 148 (Penal Provisions) A person who fails to take the measures upon the occurrence of a traffic accident under Article 54 (1) shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or by a fine not exceeding 15 million won.

Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Review of the Client's Case

The Wonju traffic accident attorney learned that the client was to undergo a police investigation for failure to take measures after a traffic accident, and

based on the client's circumstances at the time as related during the consultation, the attorney organized the points that needed to be argued as significant.

The other party also made an unreasonable demand for a settlement amount, and following the attorney's advice the client declined it,

and the client then cooperated faithfully in the ensuing police investigation with the attorney's assistance.

3. The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Arguments

To defend this case, the Wonju traffic accident attorney advanced two arguments.

The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's First Argument

Based on what was heard during the consultation, the Wonju traffic accident attorney raised questions about the other party's conduct.

The point was that the other party did not report the incident to the police immediately after the accident, but instead contacted the client personally and attempted to reach a settlement.

Attempting to settle quietly is not in itself unusual, but the settlement amount was excessively high relative to the severity of the accident,

and the attorney argued that there was room to suspect this might be a deliberate hit-and-run report intended to extract money from the other party.

The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Second Argument

Pointing to the extent of the damage after the accident, the Wonju traffic accident attorney argued that it was a very minor accident and that a contact of this degree was likely something the client would not have noticed at all.

In fact, the client was entirely unaware that the incident had occurred, and did not intentionally flee the scene after the incident.

The traffic accident attorney strongly emphasized that the client had not perceived the accident.

4. The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Case Result

About 3 months after the Wonju traffic accident attorney was retained, the case was decided as a non-referral at the police stage. The attorney's position that the client had no intent was accepted.

The Wonju Traffic Accident Attorney's Non-Referral Conclusion

The investigative authority accepted the Wonju traffic accident attorney's arguments as presented, and

finding no evidence to rebut the argument that the client had not perceived the accident, it reached a non-referral conclusion on the ground of insufficient evidence.

This is a case in which an acquittal-equivalent conclusion was obtained without yielding to the victim's unreasonable demand for a settlement amount.

If you are involved in a hit-and-run case and the victim is making an unreasonable settlement demand, you may visit Daeryun and consult with a traffic accident attorney.

Depending on the circumstances of the case and the extent of the damage, assistance may be available.

[원주교통사고변호사 불송치사례] 원주교통사고변호사 혐의없음 받아내

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Related Information
Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk