Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Deals & Cases

Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act

Jinju Criminal Attorney Case Example | Non-Referral Decision on a Charge of Violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act with the Assistance of a Daeryun Jinju Criminal Attorney

The client who came to a Jinju criminal attorney was in a situation in which the client had violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act by transferring a bankbook and account information to another person.


The client requested assistance from a Jinju criminal attorney at Daeryun Law Firm in order to resolve the situation.

CONTENTS
  • 1. The Client Who Came to a Jinju Criminal Attorney
    • - Circumstances of the Case as Identified by the Jinju Criminal Attorney
  • 2. The Jinju Criminal Attorney's Assistance in Responding to the Case
    • - Jinju Criminal Attorney Argued That the Client Had Not Known the Conduct Was a Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act
    • - Jinju Criminal Attorney Emphasized the Client's Difficult Economic Circumstances
    • - Jinju Criminal Attorney Argued That the Client Had Not Obtained Any Economic Benefit
  • 3. As a Result of the Jinju Criminal Attorney's Assistance, a Non-Referral Decision
    • - If You Have Violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, You Need the Assistance of an Experienced Criminal Attorney

1. The Client Who Came to a Jinju Criminal Attorney

The client who came to a Jinju criminal attorney was in a situation involving a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.


The client came to Daeryun Law Firm to request assistance from a criminal attorney with relevant experience.

Circumstances of the Case as Identified by the Jinju Criminal Attorney

The client in the Jinju criminal case, who came to a Daeryun Jinju criminal attorney, received a text message regarding a "low-interest loan" and came to communicate with an unidentified person who introduced himself as a product designer for emergency loans for low-income individuals.


The designer introduced the client to a government-supported low-interest product for low-income groups.


At the time, the client needed a substantial sum urgently but already had loans from primary and secondary financial institutions, which made obtaining a loan difficult.


In that situation, the client came to hear an explanation of a low-interest loan product said to be available even to persons with low credit.


The designer told the client that if the loan was processed through the designer's company's main bank, the interest rate would be lower and approval would be faster, and stated that if the client sent his name and resident registration number, the designer would check the preliminary approval limit and interest rate.


Afterward, the client in the Jinju criminal case sent the designer his name and resident registration number and decided to proceed with the loan.


Following the designer's instructions, the client opened a particular bank account.


The designer stated that there was currently a system error and that, if the client wanted fast loan approval, the client should provide the designer with the "account number, password, and mobile OTP."


The client handed over that information to the designer and afterward received a message stating that the account had been suspended from deposits and withdrawals as an account used for telecommunications-based financial fraud.


Concerned that the client's account might have been used in a fraud offense, the client came to a Daeryun Jinju criminal attorney.

2. The Jinju Criminal Attorney's Assistance in Responding to the Case

The conduct of the client in the Jinju criminal case is an unlawful act punishable under Article 49 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

Electronic Financial Transactions Act, Article 49

A person who transfers or acquires, or lends or borrows, his or her own bankbook, account information, or the like shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than three years or by a fine not exceeding 20 million won.


The Jinju criminal attorney prepared a thorough defense through a detailed legal consultation with the client.

Jinju Criminal Attorney Argued That the Client Had Not Known the Conduct Was a Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act

The Jinju criminal attorney argued that the client had not clearly recognized that the conduct was a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.


The client believed it was one of the procedures for obtaining the loan.


In fact, the client had asked the designer whether it was a legitimate loan.


The designer reassured the client by stating that it was a legitimate process.


The Jinju criminal attorney submitted the relevant text message records as evidence that the client had not known the conduct was unlawful.

Jinju Criminal Attorney Emphasized the Client's Difficult Economic Circumstances

The Jinju criminal attorney argued that the client was experiencing economic difficulties to such an extent that the client could not have noticed that the conduct was unusual.


The client needed a substantial sum but already had loans from primary and secondary financial institutions, which made a new loan difficult.


For that reason, the client was unable to doubt the designer's statement that a low-interest loan was available even with low credit.

Jinju Criminal Attorney Argued That the Client Had Not Obtained Any Economic Benefit

The Jinju criminal attorney emphasized that the client had not obtained any economic benefit from this matter.

The Jinju criminal attorney strongly argued that the client had not violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act for the purpose of economic benefit or the like.

The Jinju criminal attorney asserted that the client was also a victim deceived by a fraud group and that the client turned himself in as soon as he realized it was a fraudulent act.

3. As a Result of the Jinju Criminal Attorney's Assistance, a Non-Referral Decision

As a result of the Jinju criminal attorney's assistance, the client was able to receive a non-referral decision on the charge of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.


The client in the Jinju criminal case said, "I thought it was part of the loan process and had no idea that it was a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. I was very worried by the sudden situation, but thanks to the Daeryun Jinju criminal attorney, I was able to receive a non-referral decision."

If You Have Violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, You Need the Assistance of an Experienced Criminal Attorney

As electronic financial transactions have developed rapidly in recent years, the sanctions for violations of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act enacted to regulate them have also become stricter.


As in the client's case, violations of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act often involve persons who are charged without being aware of it.


If a person has also been deceived and suffered harm, the person must prove that there was no intent to participate in the offense.


However, it is difficult for an individual to prove that he or she is a victim, and even if intent is denied, avoiding punishment may also be difficult.


For that reason, it is advisable to obtain the assistance of an experienced criminal attorney.


Daeryun Law Firm provides clients with tailored legal services from the early stages of a case through the trial stage, with criminal attorneys experienced in this area.


If you need the assistance of a criminal attorney regarding the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, please seek a Jinju criminal attorney at Daeryun Law Firm.

[진주형사변호사 성공 사례] 대륜 진주형사변호사 도움으로 전자금융거래법위반 혐의 불송치 결정

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Related Information
Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk