Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Deals & Cases

Bodily injury, destruction of property, etc.

[Defense Against a Fine for Destruction of Property] Case in Which the Client Faced Multiple Charges Including Bodily Injury and Refusal to Leave but Received Only a Minor Fine

This is the case of a client who faced multiple charges, including destruction of property and bodily injury.

CONTENTS
  • 1. The Client Facing Multiple Charges Including Destruction of Property
    • - Why Did the Client Come to Face Charges Such as Destruction of Property?
  • 2. Emphasizing the Client's Admission of the Multiple Charges and Remorse
    • - What Are the Sentences for Destruction of Property, Bodily Injury, and Refusal to Leave?
  • 3. Court Imposes a Minor Fine on the Defendant Charged With Destruction of Property and Other Offenses

1. The Client Facing Multiple Charges Including Destruction of Property

The client, who came to face multiple charges including destruction of property, was in a business partnership with the victim. The client had been dissatisfied that the victim had installed CCTV and other devices inside the company without consulting the client.

The client, who had protested to the victim, reportedly ended up in an argument. At the end of the argument, the client damaged the CCTV installed at the company, which led to a charge of destruction of property.

In addition, the client ignored the victim's request to leave, used profanity, and used violence against the victim, so the client also came to face charges of refusal to leave and bodily injury.

The client, who faced the prospect of a heavy sentence due to the multiple charges, wished to reduce the sentence for the destruction of property and other charges with the assistance of an experienced defense attorney.

Why Did the Client Come to Face Charges Such as Destruction of Property?

This is the story of a client who came to commit several offenses, including destruction of property. The client had been carrying on a business with the victim, who was a business partner.

However, one day the victim reportedly installed CCTV and other devices without obtaining the client's consent.

When the client expressed dissatisfaction about this, the victim reportedly became very angry with the client.

As both parties grew upset, the situation escalated into violence and led to this case.

The client, who wished to avoid detention in court, requested that Daeryun take on the case.

The Daeryun attorney committed to helping the client avoid detention in court and to reducing the sentence as much as possible.

2. Emphasizing the Client's Admission of the Multiple Charges and Remorse

Through a thorough consultation with the client, Daeryun Law Firm formed a team of attorneys made up of multiple specialists with extensive experience in destruction of property, bodily injury, and refusal to leave cases.

The Daeryun attorney team emphasized that the defendant admitted the charges in this case and was deeply remorseful, and argued for the most lenient disposition possible.

■ The defendant was a person who had operated the company together with the victim and committed the offenses in this case impulsively

■ The defendant came to damage the CCTV and other devices inside the company after an argument with the victim

■ The defendant admitted all of the offenses and was remorseful

■ The defendant was a first-time offender who had never received any criminal punishment apart from this case

■ The defendant conveyed an apology to the victim

What Are the Sentences for Destruction of Property, Bodily Injury, and Refusal to Leave?

Let us look at the respective levels of punishment for destruction of property, bodily injury, refusal to leave, and similar offenses.

Criminal Act Article 366 (Destruction of Property, etc.) A person who damages or conceals another's property, document, or special media record such as an electronic record, or otherwise impairs its utility, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 3 years or a fine not exceeding 7 million won.

Criminal Act Article 257 (Bodily Injury, Bodily Injury to a Lineal Ascendant) (1) A person who inflicts bodily injury upon another shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 7 years, suspension of qualifications for not more than 10 years, or a fine not exceeding 10 million won.

(2) A person who commits the offense under paragraph (1) against a lineal ascendant of the person or the person's spouse shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine not exceeding 15 million won.

(3) An attempt to commit the offense under the preceding two paragraphs shall be punished.

Criminal Act Article 319 (Intrusion upon Habitation, Refusal to Leave) (1) A person who intrudes upon another's dwelling, managed building, ship, aircraft, or occupied room shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 3 years or a fine not exceeding 5 million won.

(2) A person who, having been requested to leave the place referred to in the preceding paragraph, fails to comply shall be subject to the same punishment as in the preceding paragraph.

Because the above charges constitute serious crimes, the assistance of an experienced attorney is needed.

3. Court Imposes a Minor Fine on the Defendant Charged With Destruction of Property and Other Offenses

The court accepted the arguments of the Daeryun Law Firm attorney and imposed a fine on the defendant charged with destruction of property and other offenses.

Destruction of property is a serious crime that can carry imprisonment of up to 3 years. In this case, the client faced not only the destruction of property charge but also multiple charges, including bodily injury and refusal to leave, which placed the client at an even greater disadvantage at trial.

The Daeryun attorney accurately ascertained the circumstances of the case, organized the points that could most reduce the sentence, and argued them, and was able to conclude the case with a minor fine.

Daeryun Law Firm forms working teams composed of multiple legal specialists to maximize expertise, and through Daeryun's own litigation system built on its record of resolved cases, it has guided the cases entrusted to it toward successful outcomes.

If you need the help of an experienced attorney in a criminal case or similar matter, you may wish to seek the assistance of the Daeryun Criminal Group.

At the Daeryun Criminal Group, attorneys with more than 20 years of legal experience form teams tailored to each case to resolve it.

[재물손괴죄 벌금형 방어] 상해, 퇴거불응 등 다수 혐의 받았으나 경미한 벌금형 받은 사례

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Related Information
Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk