[Criminal Attorney Appellate Acquittal Case] Acquittal Won by Proving the Absence of Direct Evidence of the Defendant's Theft

This is the case of a client who requested the criminal attorney's help with a theft charge. The client had already been sentenced to a fine at the first instance on a theft charge.

Looking at the case, the client was a delivery driver who had gone to the restaurant to deliver goods. At the time, the restaurant owner was away, and the client, who was the person present there, came under the victim's suspicion.

However, there was neither a witness nor evidence that the client had stolen the victim's property.

It was more likely that this was a misunderstanding caused by the victim's mistaken belief or that someone other than the client had stolen the victim's property.

Nonetheless, the first-instance court sentenced the client to a fine.

Through close consultation with the client, the Daeryun Law Firm criminal attorney formed a specialist attorney team composed of multiple specialists with extensive case experience.

The Daeryun criminal attorney team emphasized that there was no objective evidence to prove that the defendant had stolen the victim's property, and the team firmly argued that the defendant should be acquitted.

■ The victim in this case claimed that the defendant had stolen the victim's mobile phone and money at the restaurant, but no objective evidence existed

■ The movement location of the stolen mobile phone and the defendant's movements were found to be inconsistent

■ The materials submitted as evidentiary records also had many missing items

■ In particular, there was no clear evidence for the facts charged in this case

■ There were problems with the court's determination of guilt despite the absence of clear evidence

Accepting the argument of the Daeryun Law Firm criminal attorney, the court reversed the lower court's judgment and acquitted the defendant.

The client in the above case was unfairly cast as a thief. The client pleaded injustice at trial but was found guilty at the first instance.

Because the client came to Daeryun to contest the case for an acquittal, the attorney identified and analyzed the problems and conducted the pleading, and in the end the first instance was reversed and an acquittal was obtained.

An acquittal is rendered when a case does not legally constitute a crime or when there is no evidence of the criminal facts.

Acquittals are very few in number, and because the first-instance court's determination must be reversed, the assistance of a legal specialist such as a criminal attorney can be important.

Daeryun Law Firm organizes performance teams composed of multiple legal specialists to maximize expertise, and with Daeryun's own litigation system built on the basis of its resolved cases, it has guided the cases entrusted to it toward favorable outcomes.