CONTENTS
- 1. The Client Who Requested Help from a Busan Tax Attorney

- - The Truth Revealed Through the Consultation with the Tax Attorney
- 2. Busan Tax Attorney: "The Defendant Is Not the Actual Business Owner...Merely an Employee Who Had No Choice but to Obey Directions"

- - What Is the Sentence for a Violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, as Explained by a Tax Attorney?
- 3. The Court Accepts the Busan Tax Attorney's Arguments

1. The Client Who Requested Help from a Busan Tax Attorney
The Busan client who requested help from a Busan tax attorney had established a stock company at the direction of a business owner and served as its representative director, and came to the tax attorney after violating the law.
The Busan tax attorney analyzed that the issue in the client's case was that false tax invoices had been issued to the business owner's company in the name of the stock company.
Although all of this was carried out at the direction of the business owner, the client had violated the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, which provides that 'no person shall issue a tax invoice without supplying goods or services.'
The Truth Revealed Through the Consultation with the Tax Attorney
In the consultation with the Busan tax attorney, the client disclosed that, under coercion by the business owner, the client had taken on the position of representative of the stock company and even issued false tax invoices.
However, all of the client's conduct was subject to criminal punishment. Fearing that the client might receive a heavy sentence, the client asked the Daeryun Busan tax attorney to find a way to avoid detention in court.
2. Busan Tax Attorney: "The Defendant Is Not the Actual Business Owner...Merely an Employee Who Had No Choice but to Obey Directions"
Through a careful consultation with the client, Daeryun Law Firm formed a Busan tax attorney team composed of multiple specialists with rich experience in cases involving violations of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act.
The Daeryun Busan tax attorney team established the circumstances under which the defendant had issued the false tax invoices and argued for the most lenient disposition possible.
- The defendant was not the actual business owner and had issued the false tax invoices at the direction of the actual business owner
- The defendant acknowledged the facts charged and cooperated actively with the investigation
What Is the Sentence for a Violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, as Explained by a Tax Attorney?
The Punishment of Tax Evaders Act is a law whose purpose is to enhance the effectiveness of the tax laws and establish sound tax-paying awareness among the public by providing for matters such as penalties and administrative fines against those who violate the tax laws, and it sets out regulatory offenses, accusations, and punishment.
Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, Article 3 (Tax Evasion, etc.) (1) A person who evades a tax or receives a refund or deduction of tax by fraud or other improper means shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or by a fine not exceeding twice the amount of the evaded tax or the refunded or deducted tax (hereinafter referred to as the "evaded tax amount, etc."). However, in any of the following cases, the person shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 3 years or by a fine not exceeding three times the evaded tax amount, etc. 1. Where the evaded tax amount, etc., is 300 million won or more, and that evaded tax amount, etc., is 30/100 or more of the tax amount to be reported and paid (in the case of a tax that the government assesses and collects based on the taxpayer's report, it means the tax amount to be determined and notified) 2. Where the evaded tax amount, etc., is 500 million won or more (2) A person who commits the crime under paragraph (1) may be punished by both imprisonment and a fine according to the circumstances. (3) Where a person who commits the crime under paragraph (1) files a revised return with respect to the evaded tax amount, etc., within 2 years after the statutory reporting deadline has passed under Article 45 of the Framework Act on National Taxes, or files a return after the deadline within 6 months after the statutory reporting deadline has passed under Article 45-3 of the same Act, the sentence may be mitigated. (4) The sentence of a person who habitually commits the crime under paragraph (1) shall be aggravated by one half. (5) The time of completion (consummation) of the regulatory offense provided for in paragraph (1) shall be classified as follows. 1. A tax that the government assesses and collects based on the taxpayer's report: The time when the payment deadline passes after the government determines or assesses the tax base of the relevant tax item. However, where the government cannot determine or assess the tax base of the relevant tax item because the taxpayer, for the purpose of evading tax, fails to report the tax base under the tax laws, it shall be the time when the reporting deadline for the tax base of the relevant tax item passes. 2. A tax not falling under subparagraph 1: The time when its reporting and payment deadline passes (6) In paragraph (1), "fraud or other improper means" means an active act falling under any of the following subparagraphs that makes the assessment and collection of tax impossible or significantly difficult. 1. False bookkeeping, such as the preparation of double books 2. The preparation and receipt of false evidence or false documents 3. The destruction of books and records 4. The concealment of property, or the manipulation or concealment of income, revenue, acts, or transactions 5. Intentionally failing to prepare or keep books, or the manipulation of invoices, tax invoices, aggregate invoices, or aggregate tax invoices 6. The manipulation of enterprise-wide resource management facilities under Article 5-2, subparagraph 1, of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act, or the manipulation of electronic tax invoices 7. Any other act by deceit (fraudulent scheme) or improper act |
3. The Court Accepts the Busan Tax Attorney's Arguments
The court accepted the arguments of the Daeryun Law Firm Busan tax attorney and rendered a judgment stating, "The defendant is sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment. However, the execution of the above imprisonment is suspended for 2 years from the date this judgment becomes final."
In a tax evasion case, if there is an error in the indictment or the investigation record, it must be clearly contested during the trial.
Preparing various favorable sentencing materials and focusing on the procedure can lead to a good result.
Because the punishment varies depending on how the matter is handled and how precisely it is addressed, the help of a specialist such as a Busan tax attorney can be necessary.
Daeryun Law Firm organizes a team composed of multiple legal specialists to maximize expertise, and, with Daeryun's own litigation system built on prior cases, has guided entrusted cases to favorable outcomes.
![조세범처벌법위반 집행유예 판결문 [부산조세변호사 조력사례] 부산조세변호사, 조세범 처벌법 위반 피고인 실질적 사업주 아님을 밝혀 집행유예 받아내](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fd1tgonli21s4df.cloudfront.net%2Fupload%2Fseo%2Fsuccess%2F20240508060636694.webp&w=828&q=100)
This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.






