CONTENTS
- 1. The Client Who Came to the Ulsan Damages Attorney

- - The Circumstances of the Case as Understood by the Ulsan Damages Attorney
- - Traffic Accident Damages as Explained by the Ulsan Damages Attorney
- - The Methods of Defending Against Traffic Accident Damages as Explained by the Ulsan Damages Attorney
- 2. The Assistance Provided by the Ulsan Damages Attorney

- - Ulsan Damages Attorney, There Was No Evidence That the Amount of Loss Was 50 Million Won
- - Ulsan Damages Attorney, Arguing That the Remaining Claims Other Than Vehicle Ownership Were Denied
- 3. As a Result of the Ulsan Damages Attorney's Assistance, a 99% Reduction

- - The Case Notebook of the Ulsan Damages Attorney
1. The Client Who Came to the Ulsan Damages Attorney
The Ulsan damages attorney was in a situation in which the client had received a complaint in a civil lawsuit demanding payment of 50 million won in damages.
In response, the client visited the Ulsan office of Daeryun Law Firm in order to respond with the assistance of an attorney with extensive experience in damages litigation.

The Circumstances of the Case as Understood by the Ulsan Damages Attorney
The circumstances of the client's damages case, as understood by the Ulsan damages attorney through consultation, are as follows.
The client's vehicle had broken down, so the client had entrusted the vehicle repair to a close acquaintance.
However, one day the client received a complaint in a civil lawsuit demanding 50 million won as damages for a traffic accident.
As it turned out, the acquaintance who had finished repairing the vehicle had driven the car around without the client's knowledge and caused an accident.
As a result, the client, as the owner of the vehicle, could not avoid liability, and in order to obtain at least a reduction, the client visited the Ulsan damages attorney of Daeryun Law Firm and requested assistance.
Traffic Accident Damages as Explained by the Ulsan Damages Attorney
The client who sought out the Ulsan damages attorney was in a situation involving a 🔗traffic accident damages lawsuit.
Under the Civil Act and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, when a person injures another person's body or damages another person's property while operating a motor vehicle, the person must compensate for that loss.
Although the client did not personally drive the vehicle, the client came to bear liability as the owner of the vehicle.
A person who causes loss to another by an unlawful act, intentionally or negligently, shall be liable to compensate for such loss.
Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act Article 3 (Liability for Automobile Accident Compensation)
A person who operates an automobile for the person's own benefit shall be liable to compensate for the loss where another person is killed or injured by such operation.
The Methods of Defending Against Traffic Accident Damages as Explained by the Ulsan Damages Attorney
If harm is caused to the other party through one's own fault while driving, it is only natural to compensate for the loss.
However, there is no need to unconditionally pay the amount claimed by the victim.
This is because a huge amount may be claimed that differs from the loss actually incurred.
Therefore, if you have received a complaint in a claim for damages lawsuit, you should promptly consult a legal professional and, considering factors such as the scale of the traffic accident, the degree of damage to the vehicle, and the degree of the victim's injury, verify whether the claimed amount of damages is excessive.
2. The Assistance Provided by the Ulsan Damages Attorney
The Ulsan damages attorney examined the arguments of the plaintiff, who had claimed damages, and the related materials, focusing on accurately understanding the facts.
Thereafter, the attorney argued, on the following grounds, that the plaintiff had claimed an excessive amount of damages.
Ulsan Damages Attorney, There Was No Evidence That the Amount of Loss Was 50 Million Won
The plaintiff did not specifically identify each item of loss.
Furthermore, when considered comprehensively, taking into account the scale of the traffic accident, the degree of damage to the plaintiff's vehicle, and the degree of injury, the amount of 50 million won may be regarded as excessive.
Therefore, the Ulsan damages attorney strongly argued that there was no evidence to prove that the amount of damages reached 50 million won.
Ulsan Damages Attorney, Arguing That the Remaining Claims Other Than Vehicle Ownership Were Denied
The client had entrusted the vehicle repair to an acquaintance, but the acquaintance had operated the vehicle in secret and caused the accident, so the client had no way of knowing that the accident had occurred at all.
In response, the Ulsan damages attorney argued that, while the vehicle involved in the accident was indeed owned by the client, the client denied all of the other liability for damages claimed by the plaintiff.
3. As a Result of the Ulsan Damages Attorney's Assistance, a 99% Reduction
Accepting all of the arguments diligently prepared by the Ulsan damages attorney, the court granted only 1% of the amount of damages claimed by the plaintiff.
As a result, the client was able to conclude the case with 500,000 won rather than 50 million won.
The Case Notebook of the Ulsan Damages Attorney
The above case was one in which a client who was subjected to a claim for traffic accident damages solely on the ground of being the owner of the vehicle, although the client did not personally drive it, sought out the Ulsan damages attorney in order to reduce the amount of damages.
Daeryun Law Firm provides its utmost assistance to minimize the harm to clients through accurate review and application of fault ratios.
If you are experiencing difficulties due to an excessive amount of damages, as described above, please request a 🔗consultation at the 🔗Ulsan Office of Daeryun Law Firm at any time.

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.







