Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Deals & Cases

Evasion of compulsory execution, Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act, Violation of financial laws

Bank Account Attachment | Concluded With Acquittal on Charges Including Evasion of Compulsory Execution

The client, who was sued with a bank account attached, was pressed to repay approximately 30 million won in debt incurred while living together by a former coworker with whom the client had cohabited, and was even subjected to a criminal complaint.

CONTENTS
  • 1. Bank Account Attachment | Case Background
    • - The Client's Account
    • - Case Timeline
    • - The Creditor's Misunderstanding
  • 2. Bank Account Attachment | Case Review
    • - An Argument Based on Precedent
  • 3. Bank Account Attachment | Substance of the Assistance
  • 4. Bank Account Attachment | Defense Against a Custodial Sentence With Acquittal on All Counts

1. Bank Account Attachment | Case Background

Daeryun Law Firm individual debt collection individual rehabilitation petition charged with the crime of evasion of compulsory execution

The client, whose bank account had been attached and who had been criminally accused, explained that the client had been receiving demands to repay money borrowed for living expenses and, while diligently repaying it, had been criminally accused.

The complainant alleged that the client had hidden assets for the purpose of evading compulsory execution and had filed an individual rehabilitation petition by falsely understating income, asserting charges of the crime of evasion of compulsory execution and violation of the Debtor Rehabilitation Act.


Since the client was currently barely making a living, earning the minimum wage through part-time work, the client sought out a Daeryun Law Firm attorney to request help in defending against the criminal trial.

The Client's Account

The client received about 30 million won from a coworker with whom he had previously lived together, in the name of a jeonse deposit and living expenses.

Because it was money used while living together without a clear awareness that it was ‘borrowed money,’ the client did not even recognize an obligation to repay it.

Afterward, when the complainant (the creditor) attached the client's bank account and attempted compulsory execution, the client for the first time came to recognize that it was ‘money to be repaid (a debt).’

The client had been diligently repaying the amount over about two years, working part-time jobs with the will to repay 100% of it, but he was suddenly subjected to a criminal complaint.

The serious charge of abusing the rehabilitation procedure through concealment of assets and understatement of income had been raised.

Case Timeline

The attorney sought to organize the timeline of the case to explain the reason the client came to be the subject of a criminal complaint.

Timeline

During cohabitation, received and used about 30 million won under the name of jeonse funds and living expenses

(part of it was a joint expenditure)

Two years after the cohabitation ended, came to recognize the debt upon hearing from the complainant about an attachment of a bank account

Maintained a livelihood by sending part of the money earned from part-time work to an acquaintance's account

Repaid diligently, but when it became too much to bear, used the individual rehabilitation system

Received a decision to commence rehabilitation proceedings from the court

The rehabilitation decision was finalized

Was subjected to a criminal complaint on charges of evasion of compulsory execution and violation of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act

Requested a response from a Daeryun Law Firm attorney

The Creditor's Misunderstanding

Most people undergoing the individual rehabilitation procedure often receive their wages using a bank account in another person's name.

This is not an intentional or malicious effort to deceive creditors, but rather one of the means by which debtors with poor credit make a living.

In particular, because most people who have applied for individual rehabilitation are not in a financial position to pursue their own gain, there is no realistic reason to find that they had the intent to evade compulsory execution.

For this reason, cases sometimes arise in which creditors mistakenly believe that the debtor has concealed assets.

2. Bank Account Attachment | Case Review

Daeryun Law Firm individual debt collection case identified the issues and assisted

The Daeryun Law Firm attorney who took on the case of the client whose account had been attached and who had filed an individual rehabilitation petition identified the issues and then sought to argue for the client's acquittal.

Issue

Content

Whether assets were concealed

Determined that assets had been concealed, based on the fact that the client transferred wages to another person's account immediately after receiving them

→ Need to argue that the transfer was the sharing of living expenses for the purpose of subsistence and was a realistic means of living, not title trust or intentional concealment

Whether wages were understated

The client reported a smaller amount than the actual wages when filing for rehabilitation

→ Argue that the split payment of wages was due to the company's internal wage payment structure

Abuse of the rehabilitation procedure

Intentionally abused the rehabilitation procedure by understating the asset list submitted to the rehabilitation court

→ All assets were reported transparently, and a portion was repaid through the rehabilitation procedure

An Argument Based on Precedent

The Daeryun Law Firm attorney organized the client's situation clearly by citing the following precedents and rebutted the prosecution's arguments.

Category

Related content

Supreme Court

2017Do6229 decision

Where an account used to receive wages constituting an attachment-prohibited claim (wages of 1.85 million won or less) is attached,

even if the debtor receives wages through another, non-attached account, this cannot be regarded as the crime of evasion of compulsory execution

The client's wages fall within attachment-prohibited claims

Transferring them to an account in another's name was also for the purpose of subsistence, not for the purpose of evading compulsory execution

Supreme Court

2000Do1447 decision

A transfer of property made by genuine intent, even if made for the purpose of evading compulsory execution,

does not constitute "false transfer or concealment"

Transferring money to the account of the client's acquaintance was a transfer made by genuine intent for the purpose of living expenses

and supports that it was not false concealment

Supreme Court

2010Do1189 en banc decision

The mere fact that property was concealed cannot give rise to a presumption that there was a "purpose of evading compulsory execution"

Whether the client intended to hide assets cannot be concluded from the mere act of remittance alone

3. Bank Account Attachment | Substance of the Assistance

For the client, who had been criminally accused while the client's bank account was attached, the attorney assisted the client through the following arguments.

Assistance

Details

Submission of materials evidencing income flow and living circumstances

From the early stage of the investigation, submitted materials regarding the client's income flow and living circumstances to prove the economic hardship

Transfer details to an account in an acquaintance's name

Assertion of the purpose of use

Organized the details of transfers made to an account in an acquaintance's name to assert that the purpose was use as living expenses

Denied any intent to conceal property

Confirmation of the fact of repayment performed within the rehabilitation procedure

Ascertaining the deposit and salary flow

Transparently reconstructed the fact that repayment was performed within the rehabilitation procedure and the deposit and salary flow to prove faithful performance

Absence of intent

In the course of the trial, emphasized the client's sincerity, hardship in living, and absence of intent to fully rebut the charge

4. Bank Account Attachment | Defense Against a Custodial Sentence With Acquittal on All Counts

Daeryun Law Firm individual debt collection criminal complaint full defense acquittal

Thanks to the assistance of the attorney who took on the case of the client, who had been criminally charged with his account attached, the client was acquitted on all charges, including evasion of compulsory execution and violation of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act.

It was a case in which a criminal record could have remained because of the inability to repay debts, but the client's difficult livelihood and the sincerity of his rehabilitation were recognized, and he was able to avoid punishment.

In this way, with accurate legal responses and appropriate assistance from a legal professional, you may be able to clear yourself of an unjust charge.

If you are currently in a similar situation, please review your circumstances through a 🔗debt attorney legal consultation appointment.

Daeryun, the ninth-ranked law firm in Korea (based on 2025 National Tax Service value-added tax filings), provides tailored legal services.

통장압류 무죄

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Related Information
Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk