CONTENTS
- 1. The Client Who Sought Assistance in Responding to a Fair Trade Commission Investigation
- - How the Investigation Began
- 2. How to Respond to a Fair Trade Commission Investigation
- 3. Assistance in Responding to a Fair Trade Commission Investigation
- - Analysis of the Transaction Structure and Securing of Objective Materials
- - Verification of the Legitimacy of Internal Procedures
- - Establishing and Executing the Strategy for Responding to the Investigation
- 4. Result of the Fair Trade Commission Investigation: Closed with No Suspicion of Crime
- - If You Are Facing an Investigation
1. The Client Who Sought Assistance in Responding to a Fair Trade Commission Investigation
The client, who came under investigation by the Fair Trade Commission, requested the assistance of a corporate attorney in order to dispel the suspicion that benefits had been concentrated in a particular affiliate in the course of jointly using research and development personnel and facilities among affiliates.
How the Investigation Began
The company that requested assistance with the Fair Trade Commission investigation was an affiliate that produces and distributes electronic components in Korea.
The client came under investigation amid suspicion that, in the course of jointly using research and development personnel and facilities between the parent company and the affiliate, greater profit had flowed to certain affiliates.
The Fair Trade Commission focused on examining whether this transaction structure was "an internal transaction within the normal range, or an unfair support act."
Accordingly, in order to prevent unnecessary misunderstanding and the expansion of suspicion from the early stage, the client requested the assistance of an attorney specializing in corporate matters in responding to the investigation.
2. How to Respond to a Fair Trade Commission Investigation
A Fair Trade Commission investigation does not merely verify transaction records, but comprehensively examines the transaction structure, the method of calculating consideration, and even the internal decision-making procedures.
Accordingly, the outcome can vary significantly depending on how a company responds at an early stage.
① Organizing the transaction structure and supporting materials
It is important to secure objective comparative grounds, such as industry average unit prices and similar transaction precedents, rather than figures alone.
② Verifying internal decision-making procedures
Emphasizing that the transactions did not operate to the advantage of any particular person can reduce unnecessary misunderstanding.
③ Preparing investigation response scenarios
It is also necessary to clearly delineate the scope of the materials to be submitted in order to prevent the unnecessary disclosure of information.
3. Assistance in Responding to a Fair Trade Commission Investigation
The issue in this case was whether the structure of joint use among affiliates fell within the scope of normal intra-group transactions, or whether it constituted an unfair support act that provided a benefit to a particular affiliate.
In response, at the early stage of the case the corporate law specialist attorney formed a task force composed of attorneys with extensive practical experience and provided the following assistance, focusing on analysis of the transaction structure, verification of internal procedures, and the establishment of a strategy for responding to the investigation.
Analysis of the Transaction Structure and Securing of Objective Materials
The corporate attorney closely examined the research and development and the use of facilities and analyzed the overall transaction structure.
In that process, the attorney prepared materials comparing the matter with the industry average unit price and with transaction cases in similar industries, and thereby proved that the internal transaction conformed to market standards.
Through this, it was possible to clearly explain that the transaction was not the provision of preferential treatment but a normal management activity.
Verification of the Legitimacy of Internal Procedures
The firm carefully organized the internal approval system, meeting minutes, regulations, and the like to secure procedural legitimacy.
In particular, it emphasized that no specific executive or specially related person intervened in the decision-making, thereby preemptively foreclosing the possibility of private gain.
In addition, it demonstrated that the cost-allocation standard had been prepared in advance in accordance with internal regulations, thereby proving that it was not an intentional support act.
Establishing and Executing the Strategy for Responding to the Investigation
The corporate attorney organized the questions expected during the investigation process, and established a consistent system of responses through mock interviews with the executives and staff.
By clearly distinguishing between the materials that could be submitted and the grounds for non-disclosure, the attorney minimized the submission of materials that could give rise to unnecessary misunderstanding.
4. Result of the Fair Trade Commission Investigation: Closed with No Suspicion of Crime
The investigation began on suspicion that the client had provided preferential treatment to an affiliate, but, through the assistance of a corporate attorney, most of the suspicions were resolved and the matter was concluded as no charge.
The client was thus able to continue normal business activities without any disadvantage such as a penalty surcharge or a corrective order.
If You Are Facing an Investigation
An investigation by the Fair Trade Commission does not simply verify accounting figures; it closely examines the background of the transactions, the pricing structure, and the internal procedures.
If a company responds entirely on its own, a minor suspicion may therefore expand and lead to a penalty surcharge or criminal punishment.
At this firm, corporate attorneys who have handled numerous fair trade cases form a task force and provide structured assistance throughout the entire process, from data analysis and strategy development to responding to the investigation, beginning at the early stage.
In addition, through tailored strategies that take into account the company's long-term risk management and management stability, the firm focuses on minimizing the client's legal risk.
If you are facing an investigation by the Fair Trade Commission, 🔗Legal Consultation Bookingmay be used to develop an initial response strategy together with a corporate attorney.
See More
Watch related video content
for this case study.
Fair and just! Fair Trade Commission investigation preparation campaign with lawyers
This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.
