Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Case Analysis / Legal Updates

Daeryun Law LLC, with expertise across practice areas,
provides analysis of court rulings and legal issues.

Lease Agreement Law | Analysis of a District Court Judgment Holding That a Lease Agreement Cannot Be Terminated on the Ground of Inter-Floor Noise

We will analyze a District Court judgment holding that, under lease agreement law, inter-floor noise cannot serve as a ground for terminating a lease agreement.

CONTENTS
  • 1. Lease Agreement Law, What Were the Detailed Circumstances?
    • - Lease Agreement Law, What Are the Relevant Statutes?
  • 2. Lease Agreement Law, What Was the Court's Determination?
  • 3. Lease Agreement Law, What Is Daeryun's Strategy?

1. Lease Agreement Law, What Were the Detailed Circumstances?

In this case, the plaintiff, A, entered into a lease agreement for an apartment unit in the OO Apartment with the defendant, B, and moved into the unit.

From the moment the plaintiff moved in, the plaintiff complained of distress over inter-floor noise from the unit above to both the apartment management office and the defendant and requested measures. In response, the defendant and the management office conveyed the fact that an inter-floor noise complaint had arisen to the resident of the upper unit and requested caution on several occasions.

The problem, however, did not improve at all, and the plaintiff, suffering mental distress as a result, went so far as to lease a separate officetel unit.

Even so, the defendant took no measures whatsoever in response.

Accordingly, the plaintiff argued that the defendant had ‘failed to perform the obligation to allow the lessee to use and derive profit from the leased object and had violated the duty of repair of the leased object,’ and, claiming that achieving the purpose of the lease agreement had become impossible, the plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff would terminate the agreement and that the defendant must therefore return the lease deposit, and filed suit.

The defendant, on the other hand, countered that the former lessee, who had resided in the apartment for seven years before the plaintiff leased it, had shared the upper and lower units with the resident above for approximately two years and seven months and had never filed a complaint on the ground of inter-floor noise during that period, so that it could not be found that inter-floor noise exceeding the tolerable limit* asserted by the plaintiff had occurred.

*Tolerable limit: the threshold up to which the parties can mutually endure the degree of harm when an infringement of environmental rights, pollution, noise, or the like arises and interferes with or harms another person's life.

Lease Agreement Law, What Are the Relevant Statutes?

Article 623 of the Civil Act (Obligations of the Lessor)

The lessor shall deliver the object to the lessee and shall bear the obligation to maintain it in a condition necessary for its use and profit during the continuance of the contract.

Article 31 of the Housing Construction Promotion Act

The floors of multi-unit housing shall be constructed so that the floor-impact noise between stories does not exceed 58 decibels for light-impact noise and 50 decibels for heavy-impact noise.

Early Termination of a Lease Agreement

Even where a lease term has been agreed upon, a lease agreement may be terminated early if any of the following grounds for termination exist.

Lessee's Grounds for Termination

Where the lessor performs an act of preservation against the lessee's will and the lessee is thereby unable to achieve the purpose of the lease

Where part of the leased object is destroyed without the lessee's fault or cannot be used or profited from for any other reason, and the purpose of the lease cannot be achieved with the remaining portion

Lessor's Grounds for Termination

Where the lessee assigns its right or sublets the leased object without the lessor's consent

Where the lessee falls into arrears in rent amounting to two periods for housing or three periods for commercial premises

Where the lessee fails to use or profit from the leased housing in accordance with the method of use prescribed by the contract or by the nature of the housing

Where the lessee significantly violates its obligations as a lessee in any other respect

2. Lease Agreement Law, What Was the Court's Determination?

With respect to lease agreement law, the court ruled in favor of the defendant.

First, the court explained that the standard that multi-unit housing must satisfy in relation to inter-floor noise is a construction standard imposed on the business entity that constructs and supplies the multi-unit housing, and is not an obligation imposed on the owner of the multi-unit housing.

The court also determined that, as for the ‘obligation to make efforts not to cause harm to other occupants and others within the multi-unit housing through inter-floor noise and the like’ prescribed in the Multi-Family Housing Management Act, that obligation rests on ‘occupants and users,’ and is not prescribed for an owner of multi-unit housing such as the defendant.

3. Lease Agreement Law, What Is Daeryun's Strategy?

We have analyzed, in relation to lease agreement law, a court judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim seeking to terminate a lease agreement on the ground of inter-floor noise.

Real estate matters such as these and 🔗lease disputes tend to involve demanding legal procedures and the collection of evidence required for proof.

The 🔗Construction and Real Estate Group of Daeryun Law Firm LLP is staffed by attorneys experienced in real estate matters who, through close consultation with each client, present a solution suited to the client's circumstances.

If you are facing difficulties due to a lease-related dispute, you are welcome to request a legal consultation with the Daeryun Construction and Real Estate Group at any time.

Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Related Information
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk