Deals & Cases
Assistance from a Daejeon Defamation Attorney | The Daejeon Defamation Attorney Who Obtained a Reduced Fine
The client who came to the Daejeon defamation attorney had been the subject of a defamation complaint filed by a coworker. The client therefore requested assistance from a Daejeon attorney regarding the defamation case.
1. The Client Who Sought a Daejeon Defamation Attorney
The client who consulted the Daejeon defamation attorney was facing a criminal complaint for defamation.
Seeking to obtain the lightest possible punishment, the client visited the Daejeon office and requested a consultation regarding the defamation response.

The Circumstances Leading to the Client Seeking a Daejeon Defamation Attorney
The circumstances of the client's case as ascertained by the Daejeon defamation attorney through consultation are as follows.
The client and the complainant were coworkers, and the client had generally held a very favorable view of the complainant.
The client therefore introduced an acquaintance to the complainant, and the complainant and the client's acquaintance began a formal relationship.
Then one day, the client heard from the acquaintance that the complainant was having an affair with another coworker.
Having heard this shocking news, the client brought up the matter on the company messenger.
The complainant, who learned of this, filed a defamation complaint against the client, claiming that the client had spread false facts and thereby damaged the complainant's reputation.
Facing the risk of punishment for defamation, the client came to a Daejeon attorney to request assistance in responding to the defamation case.
Defamation Explained by a Daejeon Defamation Attorney
The client who came to the Daejeon defamation attorney was 🔗Defamation facing charges of violating the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection through defamation.
This charge refers to defamation committed in cyberspace, such as on online messengers, communities, and bulletin boards.
When a person, for the purpose of slandering another, uses an information and communications network to state a fact or a falsehood, the offense is established and the person is punished.
In this case, if a person damages another's reputation by stating a fact, the person is subject to imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine not exceeding 30 million won.
On the other hand, if the stated fact was false, that is, untrue, the person may be subject to imprisonment for not more than seven years or a fine not exceeding 50 million won.
2. Matters of Assistance Provided by the Daejeon Defamation Attorney
The Daejeon defamation attorney established a strategy for a reduction of sentence on behalf of the client.
The attorney then made the following arguments and requested the most lenient treatment possible.
Daejeon Defamation Attorney: Argument That the Client Had No Awareness That the Statement Was False
The client believed that the information heard from an acquaintance was true and came to spread it through a messenger app.
Accordingly, the Daejeon defamation defense attorney strongly argued that the client had no awareness that the information was false.
Daejeon Defamation Attorney: Argument That the Client Had No Prior Criminal Record
The client now acknowledges all wrongdoing and has sincerely conveyed an apology to the victim.
The Daejeon defamation attorney also emphasized that the client has no prior criminal record and requested leniency for the client.
3. Result of the Daejeon Defamation Attorney's Assistance: A Minor Fine
As a result of the Daejeon defamation attorney's full efforts, the court issued a summary order in the client's defamation case.
Case Notes of the Daejeon Defamation Attorney
In this case, the client, who had spread false information on a company messenger and thereby damaged another person's reputation, visited the criminal attorney at the 🔗Daejeon Office to request assistance.
Because the Daejeon defamation attorney argued that the client had no awareness that the information was false, the client was able to conclude the matter with a minor fine.
In defamation cases, even first-time offenders are often subject to a fine, and stating false facts may result in imprisonment of up to seven years, so if you are facing related charges, it is advisable to promptly receive help from a criminal attorney.
If you are involved in defamation and face the risk of punishment such as the matter above, you may request a consultation through the 🔗legal consultation booking at the Daejeon Office.

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.
Violation of the Network Act (defamation): Want a faster, more detailed consultation?
Consult aspecialized attorney
Related Information
Explore legal information related to this case.
If You Have Been Reported for a Cybercrime, What Type of Charge Should You Confirm Before the Investigation?
Defamation of a Deceased Person: The Standard for Determining the Charge and Remarks Insulting the Deceased
If You Are Reported for Online Defamation, Could It Lead to a Fine?
Daeryun's Key Strengths

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology
More than 240 key members
1,200+ cases handled per month
* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)
more strengths
Book a legal
consultation with an attorney
All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.
Phone consultation
1800-7905
Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year


Online consultation
We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation
KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys
Related Members
View moreKey Case Studies
View more- Fine (criminal penalty)
With the Assistance of the Namyangju Attorney Office, a Defamation Client Received a Light Fine

- Non-referral (police)
No Referral for a Client Facing Imprisonment for Defamation of a Young Child

- Non-prosecution
Defended a client who was the subject of a criminal complaint for defamation, “no prosecution disposition”

Related Practice Areas
View moreConsult in other languages
Popular Columns
View moreThe Meaning of Non-Referral, and Are There Differences Among the Types of Decisions?

Establishment of the Crime of Fraud: Determining the Requirements, Case Analysis, and Sentencing Guidelines

Criminal Record Inquiry and Expungement: How to Avoid Disadvantages

The Police Investigation Process, Methods of Response, and Tips for Giving Statements

Criminal Cases: Litigation Procedure, Types of Dispositions, and How to Respond

Related Newsletters
View moreRelated Case Analysis / Legal Updates
View morePrevious
A Yongsan Criminal Defense Attorney's Defense Case | Through the Assistance of a Yongsan Criminal Defense Attorney, the Client Charged With Larceny Received a No-Referral Decision
Next
Anyang Lawyer Consultation | Defending Against an Actual Sentence Despite Charges of Involvement in Voice Phishing Exceeding 200 Million Won
View listDo you have more questions?














