Suwon Civil Litigation Attorney Assistance | Suwon Attorney, Winning a Civil Lawsuit for Confirmation of Non-Existence of Debt

This is the account of the client who requested assistance from a Suwon civil litigation attorney.

The client had usually traded stocks by gathering information in a chat room that provided tips on the latest surging stocks.

However, as analyzing the stock information took a great deal of time, the client began looking into other apps to find a more efficient method.

In the chat room, it was stated that trading stocks through App A could yield high returns, and the client promptly signed up as a member.

After depositing a large sum of money, the client became suspicious of fraud when it became impossible to cash out the proceeds.

In the meantime, the client was informed by the bank that the account had been suspended, and although the client filed a complaint as a victim of stock fraud, all of them were returned.

Accordingly, the client 🔗Lawsuit for Confirmation of Non-Existence of Debt requested assistance from a Suwon civil litigation attorney in order to file.

A lawsuit for confirmation of non-existence of debt refers to a lawsuit seeking a determination of non-existence with respect to a dispute over a debt.

In other words, it is a lawsuit filed against the creditor when the debtor has fully repaid the debt but the creditor denies this or presses for performance.

Conversely, if the holder of the right is determined to have an obligation owed to him, he may file a lawsuit seeking performance of the debt against the obligor.

The client learned that his account had been suspended because it had been used in a fraud crime.

However, that account was the account used to transfer the investment funds, and the client was likewise a victim of investment fraud.

The attorney therefore emphasized that the account had no connection whatsoever to the fraud.

The client merely suffered investment fraud damage, believing that normal stock trading would be possible using the app, and had no connection to financial fraud.

However, the attorney emphasized that the client was suffering harm, such as being unable to conduct financial transactions, because he was suspected of being the account holder of an account used for fraud.