About us Introduction Strengths Case Handling System Corporate Legal Consulting Partnerships Locations Global Partner Firms Voice of the Customer AI DaeryunCase studies Deals & Cases Insights Judgment Analysis / Legal Updates Corporation Individual Legal Intellectual Client's reviewsGroup/Center PracticesOur People Lawyer・Expert RecommendationInsights News Notices Legal Blog Archive Newsletter Case Procedure Guide Seminar

Book a Daeryun legal consultation

About Daeryun

Case results

Practice groups / Centers

Practices

Members

Lawyer・Expert Recommendation

News / Resources

Daeryun legal consultation

Case Analysis / Legal Updates

Daeryun Law LLC, with expertise across practice areas,
provides analysis of court rulings and legal issues.

Administrative Litigation | Company I, Subject to a Penalty Surcharge for a Personal Information Leak, Loses Its Revocation Lawsuit

This is a case of Company I, a recruitment information company, which received a decision dismissing its administrative litigation. It filed an administrative lawsuit seeking revocation of the penalty surcharge against the Personal Information Protection Commission, but the claim was dismissed.

Case Lawyer SooHwon KIM

SooHwon KIM

Case Lawyer HyeunGu KANG

HyeunGu KANG

Case Lawyer AhRam JANG

AhRam JANG

Violation of the Personal Information Protection Act | Card Company W, Which Used Merchants' Personal Information Without Authorization, Faces a Penalty Surcharge of 13.4 Billion Won

Card Company W was ordered to pay a penalty surcharge of 13.4 billion won for a violation of the Personal Information Protection Act. The Personal Information Protection Commission imposed a penalty surcharge on Company W, which had used merchants' personal information for card-issuance marketing without authorization.

Case Lawyer SangKwan Nam

SangKwan Nam

Case Lawyer JunMo BAE

JunMo BAE

Case Lawyer SeokJu YUN

SeokJu YUN

Violation of the Personal Information Protection Act | K and A, Which Transferred Personal Information to China, Assessed a Total of KRW 8.3 Billion in Penalty Surcharges

For a violation of the Personal Information Protection Act, the Personal Information Protection Commission resolved to impose penalty surcharges of approximately KRW 8.3 billion and corrective orders on K and A.The two companies transferred users' personal information abroad without authorization, in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act.

Case Lawyer HyeunGu KANG

HyeunGu KANG

Case Lawyer SeungJin AN

SeungJin AN

Case Lawyer Jong Su SHIN

Jong Su SHIN

Establishment of the Crime of Fraud | Supreme Court Judgment Holding That the Crime of Fraud Is Not Established in a Non-Face-to-Face Card Loan

This is a Supreme Court judgment on whether the crime of fraud is established. The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the 'act of deception,' a requirement for the crime of fraud, must necessarily be a 'deceptive act against a person.'

Case Lawyer GeunSu KIM

GeunSu KIM

Case Lawyer YoungHeum KIM

YoungHeum KIM

Case Lawyer HyeunGu KANG

HyeunGu KANG

Violation of the Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act | The Supreme Court Holds That Social Insurance Premiums Must Also Be Included in the Subcontract Amount

A construction company that violated the Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act received a penalty surcharge for recording a subcontracting ratio inflated above the actual figure. The Supreme Court clearly ruled on the scope of the subcontract amount.

Case Lawyer Jong Su SHIN

Jong Su SHIN

Case Lawyer Il Kwon LEE

Il Kwon LEE

Case Lawyer HanSik CHOI

HanSik CHOI

Commercial Lease Dispute | Supreme Court Judgment on Whether the Lease Was Renewed

This is a Supreme Court judgment, arising in a commercial lease dispute, on whether the lease was renewed. In this case, the Supreme Court held that there was a strong possibility that the lease had been impliedly renewed.

Case Lawyer YuJu SEON

YuJu SEON

Case Lawyer DongHwan KIM

DongHwan KIM

Case Lawyer DongHoon KANG

DongHoon KANG

Violation of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act | The Supreme Court Acquitting Company Y of ‘Allegedly Forcing the Lowest Prices on Franchisees’

Company Y, an operator of a food delivery platform that had been put on trial for violation of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act, recently obtained a final acquittal from the Supreme Court.The company had been indicted on the charge of forcing its franchisees to offer the lowest prices.

Case Lawyer KeJun SON

KeJun SON

Case Lawyer Jong Su SHIN

Jong Su SHIN

Case Lawyer WonSang KIM

WonSang KIM

Recorded Call Evidence | Supreme Court Recognizes the Admissibility of a Copy of a Recording File With No Original

This is a Supreme Court judgment holding that, with respect to recorded call evidence, a copy of a recording file with no original may also be admissible.Unlike the lower court, which did not recognize its admissibility, the Supreme Court recognized the admissibility.

Case Lawyer EunYoung Kim

EunYoung Kim

Case Lawyer SangSu JO

SangSu JO

Case Lawyer Sung Dong PARK

Sung Dong PARK

Court-Martial | Supreme Court Judgment on the Legality of a Search and Seizure and the Admissibility of Evidence

Court-Martial A Supreme Court judgment concerning a defendant accused of violating the Military Secret Protection Act. This is a case in which the lower court's judgment of acquittal was reversed based on a new determination regarding the legality of the search and seizure and the admissibility of the evidence.

Case Lawyer KyungOk PARK

KyungOk PARK

Case Lawyer JongSeo KIM

JongSeo KIM

Case Lawyer WonHyeop CHAE

WonHyeop CHAE

Pre-assessment Review | The Korea Customs Service's Determination on the Impropriety of the Customs Value Assessment

This is a case of Company A, which filed for a pre-assessment review (a Korea-specific procedure allowing a taxpayer to contest a tax assessment before it is formally issued). Company A requested a pre-assessment review on four grounds, but the Korea Customs Service issued a decision not to accept the request for a pre-assessment review.

Case Lawyer IlHyung LEE

IlHyung LEE

Case Lawyer ChanWoo JEONG

ChanWoo JEONG

Case Lawyer JinWon KIM

JinWon KIM

Tax Appeal | A High Court Judgment Holding That Royalties Must Be Added to the Transaction Value of Imported Goods

The following is a tax appeal litigation case. This is a case in which the customs office argued that royalties had to be added to the transaction value of the imported goods, while the plaintiff argued that they were unrelated and sought revocation.

Case Lawyer Naewon Kwak

Naewon Kwak

Case Lawyer JaeHo MYEONG

JaeHo MYEONG

Case Lawyer IlHyung LEE

IlHyung LEE

Tax Appeal Litigation | 45% vs. 8% Customs Duty Rate, Judgment That the Customs Disposition Was Unlawful

This is the case of Company A, which sought to revoke the Korea Customs Service's disposition rejecting its claim for correction of customs duty, value-added tax, and additional tax through tax appeal litigation.The court found that the Customs Service's rejection of the claim for correction was unlawful.

Case Lawyer Kwang Soo Lee

Kwang Soo Lee

Case Lawyer JaeHo MYEONG

JaeHo MYEONG

Case Lawyer HyeongGun PARK

HyeongGun PARK

1
ㆍㆍㆍ
13
14
15
16
17
ㆍㆍㆍ
29

Have more questions?

Quick Menu

Chat